Chloé R. Nater

985 total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 527 citations indexed

About

Chloé R. Nater is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Chloé R. Nater has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 527 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Ecology, 6 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 6 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Chloé R. Nater's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers). Chloé R. Nater is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers). Chloé R. Nater collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United States and Switzerland. Chloé R. Nater's co-authors include Erlend B. Nilsen, Robert B. O’Hara, Stefanie Muff, Yngvild Vindenes, Torbjørn Ergon, Ørnulf Borgan, Koen J. van Benthem, Arpat Özgül, Carsten Schradin and Cindy I. Canale and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Chloé R. Nater

15 papers receiving 522 citations

Hit Papers

Rewriting results section... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chloé R. Nater Norway 9 284 155 114 112 79 19 527
Clare Gray United Kingdom 11 435 1.5× 237 1.5× 111 1.0× 80 0.7× 65 0.8× 11 648
Philip O’B. Lyver New Zealand 14 471 1.7× 143 0.9× 109 1.0× 196 1.8× 72 0.9× 22 733
João E. Rabaça Portugal 17 481 1.7× 203 1.3× 131 1.1× 109 1.0× 79 1.0× 34 617
Nikki Thurgate Australia 3 284 1.0× 188 1.2× 64 0.6× 147 1.3× 123 1.6× 3 471
Miguel Á. Rendón Spain 14 445 1.6× 167 1.1× 188 1.6× 91 0.8× 99 1.3× 30 633
Ruth A. Howison Netherlands 12 277 1.0× 231 1.5× 137 1.2× 96 0.9× 63 0.8× 27 508
Heidi M. Rantala United States 6 380 1.3× 243 1.6× 179 1.6× 143 1.3× 84 1.1× 13 594
Ricardo F. de Lima Portugal 11 215 0.8× 133 0.9× 100 0.9× 85 0.8× 132 1.7× 47 416
Raluca Ioana Băncilă Romania 13 228 0.8× 115 0.7× 189 1.7× 262 2.3× 121 1.5× 52 513
Aliénor Jeliazkov France 11 278 1.0× 212 1.4× 128 1.1× 144 1.3× 123 1.6× 18 472

Countries citing papers authored by Chloé R. Nater

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloé R. Nater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloé R. Nater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloé R. Nater more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloé R. Nater

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloé R. Nater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloé R. Nater. The network helps show where Chloé R. Nater may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chloé R. Nater

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chloé R. Nater. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chloé R. Nater based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chloé R. Nater. Chloé R. Nater is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Nilsen, Erlend B. & Chloé R. Nater. (2025). Open integrated distance sampling for modelling age-structured population dynamics. Peer Community Journal. 5.
2.
Giménez, Olivier, et al.. (2025). Ten quick tips to get you started with Bayesian statistics. PLoS Computational Biology. 21(4). e1012898–e1012898.
3.
Nater, Chloé R., Christian Lydersen, Magnus Andersen, & Kit M. Kovacs. (2024). Harvest sustainability assessments need rethinking under climate change: A ringed seal case study from Svalbard, Norway. Ecosphere. 15(10).
4.
Paniw, Maria, et al.. (2024). Multifaceted density dependence: Social structure and seasonality effects on Serengeti lion demography. Journal of Animal Ecology. 93(10). 1493–1509. 1 indexed citations
5.
Nater, Chloé R., et al.. (2024). Large-scale spatio-temporal variation in vital rates and population dynamics of an alpine bird. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4.
7.
Nater, Chloé R.. (2024). Redefining ‘state‐of‐the‐art’ for integrated population models with immigration. Journal of Animal Ecology. 93(5). 520–524. 1 indexed citations
8.
Aarvak, Tomas, Sandra Hamel, Rolf A. Ims, et al.. (2023). Life-cycle analysis of an endangered migratory goose to assess the impact of conservation actions on population recovery. Biological Conservation. 281. 110028–110028. 1 indexed citations
9.
Lane, A. Kelly, Aud H. Halbritter, Elizabeth A. Law, et al.. (2022). Close to open—Factors that hinder and promote open science in ecology research and education. PLoS ONE. 17(12). e0278339–e0278339. 4 indexed citations
10.
Nater, Chloé R., et al.. (2022). Spatial consistency in drivers of population dynamics of a declining migratory bird. Journal of Animal Ecology. 92(1). 97–111. 15 indexed citations
11.
Gamelon, Marlène, Chloé R. Nater, Éric Baubet, et al.. (2021). Efficient use of harvest data: a size‐class‐structured integrated population model for exploited populations. Ecography. 44(9). 1296–1310. 15 indexed citations
12.
Muff, Stefanie, Erlend B. Nilsen, Robert B. O’Hara, & Chloé R. Nater. (2021). Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 37(3). 203–210. 356 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Nater, Chloé R., Nina E. Eide, Åshild Ønvik Pedersen, Nigel G. Yoccoz, & Eva Fuglei. (2021). Contributions from terrestrial and marine resources stabilize predator populations in a rapidly changing climate. Ecosphere. 12(6). 22 indexed citations
14.
Nater, Chloé R., Yngvild Vindenes, Per Aass, et al.. (2020). Size‐ and stage‐dependence in cause‐specific mortality of migratory brown trout. Journal of Animal Ecology. 89(9). 2122–2133. 15 indexed citations
15.
Moe, S. Jannicke, et al.. (2020). Long-term mark-recapture and growth data for large-sized migratory brown trout (Salmo trutta) from Lake Mjøsa, Norway. ZooKeys. 8. e52157–e52157. 5 indexed citations
16.
Ergon, Torbjørn, Ørnulf Borgan, Chloé R. Nater, & Yngvild Vindenes. (2018). The utility of mortality hazard rates in population analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 9(10). 2046–2056. 46 indexed citations
17.
Nater, Chloé R., Torbjørn Ergon, Øystein Langangen, et al.. (2018). Individual heterogeneity and early life conditions shape growth in a freshwater top predator. Ecology. 99(5). 1011–1017. 17 indexed citations
18.
Nater, Chloé R., Koen J. van Benthem, Cindy I. Canale, Carsten Schradin, & Arpat Özgül. (2018). Density feedbacks mediate effects of environmental change on population dynamics of a semidesert rodent. Journal of Animal Ecology. 87(6). 1534–1546. 18 indexed citations
19.
Nater, Chloé R., Cindy I. Canale, Koen J. van Benthem, et al.. (2016). Interactive effects of exogenous and endogenous factors on demographic rates of an African rodent. Oikos. 125(12). 1838–1848. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026