Chloe Kim
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Biosensors and Analytical Detection
- Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Peter C. SearsonKwan H. LeeMartin G. PomperLuisa M. RussellCharlene M. DawidczykRobert H. GilmanDavid SullivanSook-Hyun Park
- Journals
- Bioconjugate Chemistry (2 papers)Frontiers in Pharmacology (2 papers)ACS Sensors (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)International Journal of Nanomedicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Chloe Kim
11 papers receiving 581 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Biomaterials 263
- Biomedical Engineering 295
- Molecular Biology 276
- Pharmaceutical Science 24
- Molecular Medicine 14
Countries citing papers authored by Chloe Kim
This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe Kim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe Kim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe Kim. The network helps show where Chloe Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloe Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 12 | State-of-the-art in design rules for drug delivery platforms: Lessons learned from FDA-approved nanomedicines Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 408 |
About Chloe Kim
Chloe Kim is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (2 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (2 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (2 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Malaria Research and Control (2 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (263 citations), Biomedical Engineering (295 citations), Molecular Biology (276 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (24 citations) and Molecular Medicine (14 citations). Chloe Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter C. Searson, Kwan H. Lee, Martin G. Pomper, Luisa M. Russell, Charlene M. Dawidczyk, Robert H. Gilman, David Sullivan, Sook-Hyun Park, Ho Seon Eun and Hyojin Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Bioconjugate Chemistry, Frontiers in Pharmacology, ACS Sensors, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Nanomedicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.