Chloe Inskip
About
In The Last Decade
Chloe Inskip
7 papers receiving 906 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Ecology 820
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 231
- Genetics 224
- Social Psychology 170
- Small Animals 145
Countries citing papers authored by Chloe Inskip
This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe Inskip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe Inskip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe Inskip more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe Inskip
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe Inskip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe Inskip. The network helps show where Chloe Inskip may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chloe Inskip
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chloe Inskip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chloe Inskip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chloe Inskip. Chloe Inskip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | 69 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 64 | |
| 6 | 90 | |
| 7 | Human-felid conflict: a review of patterns and priorities worldwide breakdown → | 618 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.