Chloe Groves
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Mental Health Treatment and Access
Papers in
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 4
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 1
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 4
- Co-authors
- Helen Christensen (5 shared papers)Kathleen M Griffiths (2 shared papers)Kimberley Evans (1 shared paper)Anthony F. Jorm (1 shared paper)Ailsa Korten (3 shared papers)Kathy Griffiths (3 shared papers)Ruth Parslow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (1 paper)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)International Journal of Epidemiology (1 paper)The British Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Chloe Groves
6 papers receiving 935 citations
Chloe Groves's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Applied Psychology 443
- Social Psychology 507
- Clinical Psychology 509
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 205
- General Health Professions 228
Countries citing papers authored by Chloe Groves
This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe Groves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe Groves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe Groves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe Groves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe Groves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe Groves. The network helps show where Chloe Groves may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Chloe Groves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Effect of web-based depression literacy and cognitive–behavioural therapy interventions on stigmatising attitudes to depression Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 602 |
| 2 | 2004 | 193 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 139 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 2 |
About Chloe Groves
Chloe Groves is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Physical Activity and Health (1 paper), Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper), Nutrition and Health in Aging (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (443 citations), Social Psychology (507 citations), Clinical Psychology (509 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (205 citations) and General Health Professions (228 citations). Chloe Groves has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Helen Christensen, Kathleen M Griffiths, Kimberley Evans, Anthony F. Jorm, Ailsa Korten, Kathy Griffiths and Ruth Parslow. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Journal of Medical Internet Research, International Journal of Epidemiology and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.