Chih‐Wei Chen
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Materials Chemistry
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- E. MorosanYong-Kai LinYen‐Shin LaiAyman FayedHong‐Sen KouYung‐Chiun HerA. MarcinkovaYi‐Pai Huang
- Topics
- Iron-based superconductors research (6 papers)Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4 papers)Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Chih‐Wei Chen
40 papers receiving 709 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 304
- Materials Chemistry 247
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 226
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 150
- Condensed Matter Physics 101
Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Wei Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Wei Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Wei Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Wei Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Wei Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Wei Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Wei Chen. The network helps show where Chih‐Wei Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chih‐Wei Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chih‐Wei Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chih‐Wei Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chih‐Wei Chen. Chih‐Wei Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 121 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Studies of Mutual Fund Managers' Discretional Behaviors in Taiwan | 2 |
About Chih‐Wei Chen
Chih‐Wei Chen is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Media Technology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iron-based superconductors research (6 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4 papers) and Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (226 citations), Media Technology (79 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (101 citations). Chih‐Wei Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include E. Morosan, Yong-Kai Lin, Yen‐Shin Lai, Ayman Fayed, Hong‐Sen Kou, Yung‐Chiun Her, A. Marcinkova, Yi‐Pai Huang, Bahram Javidi and Wenjea J. Tseng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.