Chih-Pong Chang
About
In The Last Decade
Chih-Pong Chang
6 papers receiving 371 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Food Science 186
- Biomaterials 138
- Biomedical Engineering 80
- Plant Science 59
- Insect Science 40
Countries citing papers authored by Chih-Pong Chang
This map shows the geographic impact of Chih-Pong Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih-Pong Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih-Pong Chang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chih-Pong Chang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih-Pong Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih-Pong Chang. The network helps show where Chih-Pong Chang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chih-Pong Chang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chih-Pong Chang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chih-Pong Chang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chih-Pong Chang. Chih-Pong Chang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 109 | |
| 5 | 148 | |
| 6 | 113 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.