Chih‐Ching Yang

32 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Chih‐Ching Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Management Science and Operations Research 132
  • Finance 52
  • Nephrology 26
  • Economics and Econometrics 89
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 23
Replace Gail Blattenberger with:
Gail Blattenberger United States
Pier Alda Ferrari Italy
Giovanni De Luca Italy
Filippo Domma Italy
Andrea Tancredi Italy
Jerónimo Aznar Spain
Kai Zhu China
Nikolay Robinzonov Germany
Xuekui Zhang Canada
Chih‐Ching Yang relative to Gail Blattenberger United States Gail Blattenberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Gail Blattenberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chih‐Ching Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chih‐Ching Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chih‐Ching Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chih‐Ching Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chih‐Ching Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chih‐Ching Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chih‐Ching Yang. The network helps show where Chih‐Ching Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chih‐Ching Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chih‐Ching Yang Line = papers co-authored together Chih‐Ching Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200847
2 200835
3 200730
4 201130
5 201627
6 201626
7 200722
8 201219
9 201718
10 200818
11 201517
12 201714
13 200914
14 201313
15 201511
16 201110
17 20129
18 20138
19 20227
20 20126

About Chih‐Ching Yang

Chih‐Ching Yang is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Finance, having authored 35 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (10 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (5 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (4 papers), Fuzzy Systems and Optimization (4 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (3 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (132 citations), Finance (52 citations), Nephrology (26 citations), Economics and Econometrics (89 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (23 citations). Chih‐Ching Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ming‐Miin Yu, Chung‐Liang Shih, Chiang‐Ting Chien, Ming‐Chieh Ma, Chau‐Fong Chen, Ming‐Shiou Wu, Su‐Fen Yang, Yu-Ting Cheng, Tun‐Jun Tsai and Kwan‐Dun Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Service Industries Journal, Kidney Research and Clinical Practice, ˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals, American Journal of Public Health and Blood Purification.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact