Cheryl Stone
About
In The Last Decade
Cheryl Stone
6 papers receiving 145 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 47
- Social Psychology 45
- Clinical Psychology 36
- Psychiatry and Mental health 25
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 24
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Stone
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Stone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Stone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Stone. The network helps show where Cheryl Stone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Stone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Stone. Cheryl Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 99 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.