Cheryl P. Andam
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Ecology top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- J. Peter GogartenWilliam P. HanageGregory P. FournierMatthew A. ParkerBrian M. BarthDaniel H. BuckleyDavid WilliamsJukka Corander
- Topics
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (25 papers)Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (16 papers)RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Molecular MedicineMicrobiology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNature CommunicationsTrends in Ecology & Evolution
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Cheryl P. Andam
69 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Molecular Biology 833
- Ecology 400
- Plant Science 295
- Infectious Diseases 231
- Epidemiology 209
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl P. Andam
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl P. Andam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl P. Andam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl P. Andam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl P. Andam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl P. Andam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl P. Andam. The network helps show where Cheryl P. Andam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl P. Andam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl P. Andam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl P. Andam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl P. Andam. Cheryl P. Andam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 70 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 153 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 95 | |
| 15 | 44 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 73 | |
| 19 | 109 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Cheryl P. Andam
Cheryl P. Andam is a scholar working on Microbiology, Molecular Medicine and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (25 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (16 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (138 citations), Microbiology (16 citations) and Microbiology (129 citations). Cheryl P. Andam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include J. Peter Gogarten, William P. Hanage, Gregory P. Fournier, Matthew A. Parker, Brian M. Barth, Daniel H. Buckley, David Williams, Jukka Corander, Mallory J. Choudoir and Pekka Marttinen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.