Cheryl K. Gooden
- Emergency Medicine top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Biomedical Engineering
- Surgery
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Halden F. ScottRicardo A. SamsonMarc BergStephen M. SchexnayderRobert W. HickeyAlexis TopjianÉlise W. van der JagtLeon Chameides
- Topics
- Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers)Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Emergency MedicineAnesthesiology and Pain MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cheryl K. Gooden
11 papers receiving 389 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Emergency Medicine 269
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 102
- Biomedical Engineering 97
- Surgery 94
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 61
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl K. Gooden
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl K. Gooden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl K. Gooden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl K. Gooden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl K. Gooden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl K. Gooden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl K. Gooden. The network helps show where Cheryl K. Gooden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl K. Gooden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl K. Gooden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl K. Gooden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl K. Gooden. Cheryl K. Gooden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Supportbreakdown → | 322 |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 14 |
About Cheryl K. Gooden
Cheryl K. Gooden is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 12 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (269 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (61 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (28 citations). Cheryl K. Gooden has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Halden F. Scott, Ricardo A. Samson, Marc Berg, Stephen M. Schexnayder, Robert W. Hickey, Alexis Topjian, Élise W. van der Jagt, Leon Chameides, Robert M. Sutton and Janice A. Tijssen. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, PEDIATRICS and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.