Cheryl Auer

1.3k citations
19 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 17

Cheryl Auer

17 papers receiving 931 citations

Peers

Cheryl Auer
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Ophthalmology 777
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 570
  • Neurology 136
  • Infectious Diseases 138
  • Parasitology 46
Replace D. P. Choyce with:
D. P. Choyce United Kingdom
Richard S. Hoffman United States
M. Zuheir Al-Kawi Saudi Arabia
Max Gérard Martinique
Ahmad Tajudin Liza-Sharmini Malaysia
Yaron Lang Israel
Yosanan Yospaiboon Thailand
Tina Rutar United States
M. H. Boevé Netherlands
Rhea V. Morgan United States
Cheryl Auer relative to D. P. Choyce United Kingdom D. P. Choyce's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×45.3×
D. P. Choyce · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Auer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Auer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Auer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Auer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Auer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Auer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Auer. The network helps show where Cheryl Auer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl Auer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryl Auer Line = papers co-authored together Cheryl Auer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20120
2 200438
3 198622
4 198653
5 198642
6 198536
7 198525
8
Analytic approaches to the interpretation of automated threshold perimetric data for the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
198522
9 1985179
10 198481
11 1984114
12 198418
13 1984115
14 198451
15 198499
16 198319
17 198337
18
Intraocular lenses: complications and visual results.
198358
19 19821

About Cheryl Auer

Cheryl Auer is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Internal Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (4 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (777 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (570 citations), Neurology (136 citations), Infectious Diseases (138 citations) and Parasitology (46 citations). Cheryl Auer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Ronald G. Michels, Thomas A. Rice, Michael Novák, Paul W. Sternberg, Eugene de Juan, Alfred Sommer, David M. Worthen, Manuel B. Datiles, Warren R. Fagadau and Stuart L. Fine. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Survey of Ophthalmology, New England Journal of Medicine and Retina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026