Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Food Insecurity Is Positively Related to Overweight in Women
2001612 citationsMarilyn S. Townsend, Janet M Peerson et al.Journal of Nutritionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Achterberg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Achterberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Achterberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Achterberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Achterberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Achterberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Achterberg. The network helps show where Cheryl Achterberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Achterberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Achterberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Achterberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Achterberg. Cheryl Achterberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Achterberg, Cheryl. (2005). The Ages of Imitation, Authenticity and Originality. Insecta mundi. 6(1). 41.1 indexed citations
4.
Achterberg, Cheryl. (2005). What is an Honors Student. Insecta mundi. 6(1). 75.20 indexed citations
5.
Achterberg, Cheryl. (2004). Differences Between an Honors Program and Honors College: A Case Study. Insecta mundi. 5(1). 87.1 indexed citations
6.
Achterberg, Cheryl. (2004). Honors In Research: Twenty Years Later. Insecta mundi. 5(1). 33.3 indexed citations
7.
Achterberg, Cheryl, et al.. (2002). Student-Led Quality Teams In the Classroom. Insecta mundi. 3(1). 75.1 indexed citations
8.
Townsend, Marilyn S., et al.. (2001). Food Insecurity Is Positively Related to Overweight in Women. Journal of Nutrition. 131(6). 1738–1745.612 indexed citations breakdown →
AbuSabha, R., et al.. (1998). Evaluation of Nutrition Education in WIC. Evaluation of Nutrition Education in a Supplemental Food and Nutrition Program in New Mexico.. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences. 90(4). 98–104.3 indexed citations
Achterberg, Cheryl, et al.. (1993). Food and Nutrition Messages in Film. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 699(1). 295–297.3 indexed citations
18.
Achterberg, Cheryl. (1992). A perspective: challenges of teaching the dietary guidelines graphic.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 64(4). 23–26.4 indexed citations
19.
Achterberg, Cheryl. (1990). Evaluating content of a nutrition education message.. 51(4). 478–480.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.