Cheryl A. Slate
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Physiology
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Bruce W. EricksonHenry I. YamamuraThomas J. MeyerÉva VargaYoshiaki HosohataFrederick J. EhlertThomas H. BurkeyWilliam R. Roeske
- Topics
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (5 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BPharmacological Reviews
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Cheryl A. Slate
11 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Molecular Biology 248
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 196
- Materials Chemistry 96
- Physiology 59
- Organic Chemistry 57
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl A. Slate
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl A. Slate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl A. Slate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl A. Slate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl A. Slate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl A. Slate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl A. Slate. The network helps show where Cheryl A. Slate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl A. Slate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl A. Slate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl A. Slate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl A. Slate. Cheryl A. Slate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 79 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | The delta-opioid receptor: molecular pharmacology, signal transduction, and the determination of drug efficacy. | 135 |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 73 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 11 |
About Cheryl A. Slate
Cheryl A. Slate is a scholar working on Electrochemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (196 citations), Electrochemistry (25 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (34 citations). Cheryl A. Slate has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Bruce W. Erickson, Henry I. Yamamura, Thomas J. Meyer, Éva Varga, Yoshiaki Hosohata, Frederick J. Ehlert, Thomas H. Burkey, William R. Roeske, Scott Cowell and Raymond M. Quock. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Pharmacological Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.