Cherise Stanley

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 991 citations indexed

About

Cherise Stanley is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Cherise Stanley has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 991 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 13 papers in Molecular Biology and 6 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Cherise Stanley's work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers) and Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (6 papers). Cherise Stanley is often cited by papers focused on Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers) and Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry (6 papers). Cherise Stanley collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Cherise Stanley's co-authors include X. Sunney Xie, Brian G. Saar, Jay R. Reichman, Christian W. Freudiger, Gary R. Holtom, Ehud Y. Isacoff, Dirk Trauner, Raz Palty, Prashant Donthamsetti and Joshua Levitz and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

In The Last Decade

Cherise Stanley

15 papers receiving 966 citations

Hit Papers

Video-Rate Molecular Imaging in Vivo with Stimulated Rama... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cherise Stanley United States 9 581 325 312 278 207 17 991
Hope T. Beier United States 23 301 0.5× 387 1.2× 63 0.2× 233 0.8× 641 3.1× 65 1.4k
Rong Long United States 7 619 1.1× 417 1.3× 261 0.8× 135 0.5× 251 1.2× 7 1.1k
Erik Freier Germany 19 160 0.3× 419 1.3× 65 0.2× 355 1.3× 113 0.5× 28 896
Ji-Xin Cheng United States 5 687 1.2× 156 0.5× 300 1.0× 19 0.1× 195 0.9× 8 817
Chih-Chun Lin United States 8 271 0.5× 492 1.5× 126 0.4× 42 0.2× 116 0.6× 10 949
Yoichi Otsuka Japan 16 349 0.6× 246 0.8× 228 0.7× 15 0.1× 266 1.3× 44 1.0k
Chien‐Sheng Liao United States 12 589 1.0× 135 0.4× 383 1.2× 24 0.1× 223 1.1× 23 709
Gezina M.J. Segers-Nolten Netherlands 12 337 0.6× 352 1.1× 86 0.3× 35 0.1× 103 0.5× 16 585
Thomas Hellerer Germany 10 472 0.8× 151 0.5× 237 0.8× 13 0.0× 128 0.6× 21 778
Takeshi Karashima Japan 11 272 0.5× 319 1.0× 179 0.6× 15 0.1× 67 0.3× 14 727

Countries citing papers authored by Cherise Stanley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cherise Stanley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cherise Stanley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cherise Stanley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cherise Stanley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cherise Stanley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cherise Stanley. The network helps show where Cherise Stanley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cherise Stanley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cherise Stanley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cherise Stanley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cherise Stanley. Cherise Stanley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Latorraca, Naomi R., et al.. (2025). Domain coupling in activation of a family C GPCR. Nature Chemical Biology. 21(9). 1433–1443.
2.
Read, Jordan S., Cherise Stanley, Meike Visel, et al.. (2025). Dopamine D1 receptor activation in the striatum is sufficient to drive reinforcement of anteceding cortical patterns. Neuron. 113(5). 785–794.e9. 2 indexed citations
3.
Habrian, Chris, et al.. (2024). Subtype-specific conformational landscape of NMDA receptor gating. Cell Reports. 43(8). 114634–114634. 1 indexed citations
4.
Liu, William, R Steven Stowers, Adam Hoagland, et al.. (2024). Synapse-specific catecholaminergic modulation of neuronal glutamate release. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 122(1). e2420496121–e2420496121. 2 indexed citations
5.
Donthamsetti, Prashant, et al.. (2024). Cell‐Specific Optical Control of AMPA Glutamate Receptors with a Photoswitchable Tethered Antagonist. Angewandte Chemie. 136(49).
6.
Donthamsetti, Prashant, et al.. (2024). Cell‐Specific Optical Control of AMPA Glutamate Receptors with a Photoswitchable Tethered Antagonist. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 63(49). e202411181–e202411181. 1 indexed citations
7.
Winans, Amy, Drew Friedmann, Cherise Stanley, et al.. (2023). Ciliary localization of a light-activated neuronal GPCR shapes behavior. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
8.
Donthamsetti, Prashant, et al.. (2023). Optical Control of Dopamine D2-like Receptors with Cell-Specific Fast-Relaxing Photoswitches. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 145(34). 18778–18788. 9 indexed citations
9.
Winans, Amy, Drew Friedmann, Cherise Stanley, et al.. (2023). Ciliary localization of a light-activated neuronal GPCR shapes behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(43). e2311131120–e2311131120. 5 indexed citations
10.
Newman, Zachary L., Samuel J. Kenny, Seonah Moon, et al.. (2022). Determinants of synapse diversity revealed by super-resolution quantal transmission and active zone imaging. Nature Communications. 13(1). 229–229. 34 indexed citations
11.
Vyklický, Vojtěch, Cherise Stanley, Chris Habrian, & Ehud Y. Isacoff. (2021). Conformational rearrangement of the NMDA receptor amino-terminal domain during activation and allosteric modulation. Nature Communications. 12(1). 2694–2694. 14 indexed citations
12.
Donthamsetti, Prashant, Nils Winter, Adam Hoagland, et al.. (2021). Cell specific photoswitchable agonist for reversible control of endogenous dopamine receptors. Nature Communications. 12(1). 4775–4775. 31 indexed citations
13.
Donthamsetti, Prashant, Johannes Broichhagen, Vojtěch Vyklický, et al.. (2019). Genetically Targeted Optical Control of an Endogenous G Protein-Coupled Receptor. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 141(29). 11522–11530. 49 indexed citations
14.
Berry, Michael H., Amy Holt, Joshua Levitz, et al.. (2017). Restoration of patterned vision with an engineered photoactivatable G protein-coupled receptor. Nature Communications. 8(1). 1862–1862. 68 indexed citations
15.
Donthamsetti, Prashant, Nils Winter, Matthias Schönberger, et al.. (2017). Optical Control of Dopamine Receptors Using a Photoswitchable Tethered Inverse Agonist. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 139(51). 18522–18535. 66 indexed citations
16.
Palty, Raz, Cherise Stanley, & Ehud Y. Isacoff. (2015). Critical role for Orai1 C-terminal domain and TM4 in CRAC channel gating. Cell Research. 25(8). 963–980. 68 indexed citations
17.
Saar, Brian G., Christian W. Freudiger, Jay R. Reichman, et al.. (2010). Video-Rate Molecular Imaging in Vivo with Stimulated Raman Scattering. Science. 330(6009). 1368–1370. 640 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026