Chava Nachmias
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education
- Economics and Econometrics
- Strategy and Management
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- David NachmiasJ. John PalenVeronika GrimmRonald J. WonnacottThomas H. WonnacottMartin Bulmer
- Topics
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers)Place Attachment and Urban Studies (3 papers)Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Chava Nachmias
15 papers receiving 227 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Sociology and Political Science 88
- Education 57
- Economics and Econometrics 40
- Strategy and Management 36
- General Health Professions 30
Countries citing papers authored by Chava Nachmias
This map shows the geographic impact of Chava Nachmias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chava Nachmias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chava Nachmias more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chava Nachmias
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chava Nachmias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chava Nachmias. The network helps show where Chava Nachmias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chava Nachmias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chava Nachmias. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chava Nachmias based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chava Nachmias. Chava Nachmias is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Essentials of Social Statistics for a Diverse Society | 5 |
| 2 | Study guide to accompany Research methods in the social sciences, seventh edition : Chava Frankfort-Nachmias, David Nachmias | 26 |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | The Issue of Saliency and the Effect of Tracking on Self-Esteem. | 1 |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 243 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About Chava Nachmias
Chava Nachmias is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Linguistics and Language and Urban Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers), Place Attachment and Urban Studies (3 papers) and Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (18 citations), Urban Studies (15 citations) and Management Information Systems (22 citations). Chava Nachmias has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include David Nachmias, J. John Palen, Veronika Grimm, Ronald J. Wonnacott, Thomas H. Wonnacott and Martin Bulmer. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Sociology and World Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.