Charlotte Sleight

986 citations
17 papers · 540 indexed · h-index 11

Charlotte Sleight

16 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Charlotte Sleight
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 515
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 364
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 252
  • Geometry and Topology 53
  • Mathematical Physics 36
Replace Dieter Van den Bleeken with:
Dieter Van den Bleeken Belgium
Sameer Murthy United Kingdom
Christoph F. Uhlemann United States
Shamik Banerjee India
Γεώργιος Ίτσιος Greece
Andrea Campoleoni Belgium
Marieke van Beest United Kingdom
Benjamin Assel United Kingdom
Mikael Smedbäck Sweden
Prahar Mitra United States
Charlotte Sleight relative to Dieter Van den Bleeken Belgium Dieter Van den Bleeken's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Dieter Van den Bleeken · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte Sleight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte Sleight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte Sleight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte Sleight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte Sleight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte Sleight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte Sleight. The network helps show where Charlotte Sleight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Charlotte Sleight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charlotte Sleight Line = papers co-authored together Charlotte Sleight links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20245
3 20247
4 202435
5 20245
6 202324
7
A Note on Anomalous Dimensions from Crossing Kernels
20185
8 201876
9 201831
10
Lectures on Metric-like Methods in Higher Spin Holography
20171
11 201723
12 201714
13 201742
14 201682
15 201564
16 2015109
17 201417

About Charlotte Sleight

Charlotte Sleight is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (16 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (13 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (2 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (1 paper) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (515 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (364 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (252 citations). Charlotte Sleight has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Massimo Taronna, Johanna Erdmenger, Xavier Bekaert, Dmitry Ponomarev, Mario Flory, Daniel Green, Enrico Pajer, Daniel Baumann, Guilherme L. Pimentel and Austin Joyce. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of High Energy Physics and Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026