Charlotte Herbig
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Computational Mechanics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Thomas MichelyArkady V. KrasheninnikovJani KotakoskiCarsten BusseJan KnudsenMohammad A. ArmanAntonio J. Martínez‐GaleraU. Schroder
- Topics
- Graphene research and applications (20 papers)Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (7 papers)Ion-surface interactions and analysis (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Charlotte Herbig
20 papers receiving 457 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Materials Chemistry 431
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 163
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 129
- Computational Mechanics 52
- Biomedical Engineering 50
Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte Herbig
This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte Herbig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte Herbig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte Herbig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte Herbig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte Herbig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte Herbig. The network helps show where Charlotte Herbig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charlotte Herbig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charlotte Herbig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charlotte Herbig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charlotte Herbig. Charlotte Herbig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 72 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Charlotte Herbig
Charlotte Herbig is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphene research and applications (20 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (7 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (431 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (163 citations) and Computational Mechanics (52 citations). Charlotte Herbig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Michely, Arkady V. Krasheninnikov, Jani Kotakoski, Carsten Busse, Jan Knudsen, Mohammad A. Arman, Antonio J. Martínez‐Galera, U. Schroder, Michael F. Crommie and Ossi Lehtinen. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Nano Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.