Charles‐Antoine Dedryver
- Insect Science top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Frédéric FabreAnne Le RalecJean‐Christophe SimonManuel PlantegenestAude VialatteJean‐François Le GallicM. HulléSylvie Tanguy
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers)Plant and animal studies (14 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceMoroccoUnited States
In The Last Decade
Charles‐Antoine Dedryver
22 papers receiving 780 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Insect Science 667
- Plant Science 440
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 326
- Molecular Biology 108
- Genetics 73
Countries citing papers authored by Charles‐Antoine Dedryver
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles‐Antoine Dedryver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles‐Antoine Dedryver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles‐Antoine Dedryver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles‐Antoine Dedryver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles‐Antoine Dedryver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles‐Antoine Dedryver. The network helps show where Charles‐Antoine Dedryver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles‐Antoine Dedryver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles‐Antoine Dedryver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles‐Antoine Dedryver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles‐Antoine Dedryver. Charles‐Antoine Dedryver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 353 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 67 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 76 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Charles‐Antoine Dedryver
Charles‐Antoine Dedryver is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers), Plant and animal studies (14 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (667 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (326 citations) and Plant Science (440 citations). Charles‐Antoine Dedryver has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frédéric Fabre, Anne Le Ralec, Jean‐Christophe Simon, Manuel Plantegenest, Aude Vialatte, Jean‐François Le Gallic, M. Hullé, Sylvie Tanguy, Marina C. Caillaud and Virgil Fiévet. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Oecologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.