Charles Weir
- Information Systems top 5%
- Signal Processing top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Sociology and Political Science
- Software top 10%
- Co-authors
- James NobleSascha FahlAwais RashidDominik WermkeYasemin AcarLynne BlairMichelle L. MazurekMichael Backes
- Topics
- Information and Cyber Security (14 papers)Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (11 papers)Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandGermany
In The Last Decade
Charles Weir
22 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Information Systems 221
- Signal Processing 138
- Artificial Intelligence 49
- Sociology and Political Science 48
- Software 37
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Weir
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Weir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Weir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Weir. The network helps show where Charles Weir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Weir
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Weir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Weir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Weir. Charles Weir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | From Needs to Actions to Secure Apps?:The Effect of Requirements and Developer Practices on App Security | 12 |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Developer Cyber Essentials:Trialling Interventions to Improve Development Security | 0 |
| 13 | 62 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | Developer Essentials:Top Five Interventions to Support Secure Software Development | 3 |
| 16 | How to Improve the Security Skills of Mobile App Developers : Comparing and Contrasting Expert Views | 15 |
| 17 | Early Report: How to Improve Programmers' Expertise at App Security? | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Process Patterns for Personal Practice. | 4 |
| 20 | Patterns for designing in teams | 1 |
About Charles Weir
Charles Weir is a scholar working on Information Systems, Signal Processing and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 24 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information and Cyber Security (14 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (11 papers) and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (138 citations), Information Systems (221 citations) and Software (37 citations). Charles Weir has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James Noble, Sascha Fahl, Awais Rashid, Dominik Wermke, Yasemin Acar, Lynne Blair, Michelle L. Mazurek, Michael Backes, Christian Stransky and Duc Cuong Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Computer, Empirical Software Engineering and Software Practice and Experience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.