Charles Pioger
- Surgery top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Mechanics of Materials
- Rheumatology
- Co-authors
- Bertrand Sonnery‐CottetThaïs Dutra VieiraAdnan SaithnaChristophe JacquetMatthieu OllivierMathieu ThaunatRomain SeilNicolas Pujol
- Topics
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (38 papers)Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (36 papers)Sports injuries and prevention (26 papers)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Sports MedicineArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgeryThe Journal of Arthroplasty
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesLuxembourg
In The Last Decade
Charles Pioger
48 papers receiving 676 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Surgery 646
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 323
- Biomedical Engineering 60
- Mechanics of Materials 57
- Rheumatology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Pioger
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Pioger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Pioger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Pioger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Pioger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Pioger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Pioger. The network helps show where Charles Pioger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Pioger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Pioger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Pioger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Pioger. Charles Pioger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Charles Pioger
Charles Pioger is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery and Rehabilitation, having authored 53 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (38 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (36 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (323 citations), Surgery (646 citations) and Rheumatology (42 citations). Charles Pioger has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include Bertrand Sonnery‐Cottet, Thaïs Dutra Vieira, Adnan Saithna, Christophe Jacquet, Matthieu Ollivier, Mathieu Thaunat, Romain Seil, Nicolas Pujol, Raghbir Khakha and Camille Steltzlen. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery and The Journal of Arthroplasty.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.