Charles N. Ford

6.4k total citations
108 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

Charles N. Ford is a scholar working on Physiology, Speech and Hearing and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles N. Ford has authored 108 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 81 papers in Physiology, 52 papers in Speech and Hearing and 41 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Charles N. Ford's work include Voice and Speech Disorders (81 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (52 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (36 papers). Charles N. Ford is often cited by papers focused on Voice and Speech Disorders (81 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (52 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (36 papers). Charles N. Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Charles N. Ford's co-authors include Diane M. Bless, Shigeru Hirano, Dennis M. Heisey, Katsuhide Inagi, Nelson Roy, Susan L. Thibeault, Roger W. Chan, Jack J. Jiang, Nathan V. Welham and Seth H. Dailey and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Charles N. Ford

101 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Charles N. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Physiology 3.6k
  • Speech and Hearing 2.5k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.2k
  • Surgery 857
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 530
Replace Joseph R. Spiegel with:
Joseph R. Spiegel United States
Marc Remacle Belgium
Mark S. Courey United States
Diane M. Bless United States
Ryan C. Branski United States
Tadashi Nakashima Japan
F Ottaviani Italy
Gerald S. Berke United States
Eiji Yumoto Japan
Hans Edmund Eckel Germany
Joseph R. Spiegel United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Charles N. Ford
Charles N. Ford · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Charles N. Ford
Charles N. Ford · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Charles N. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles N. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles N. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles N. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles N. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles N. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles N. Ford. The network helps show where Charles N. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles N. Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles N. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles N. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles N. Ford. Charles N. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 9
2 61
3 17
4 85
5 20
6 67
7 393
8 141
9 4
10 36
11 69
12 85
13 28
14 11
15 36
16 19
17 40
18
Femmes cinéastes ou le triomphe de la volonté
1
19
Histoire populaire du cinéma
1
20
Le cinéma au service de la foi
0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026