Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System
2011576 citationsMark Howells, Holger Rogner et al.Energy Policyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Heaps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Heaps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Heaps more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Heaps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Heaps. The network helps show where Charles Heaps may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Heaps
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Heaps.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Heaps based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Heaps. Charles Heaps is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Heaps, Charles, et al.. (2014). Strategies for development of green energy systems in Mongolia.1 indexed citations
9.
Huber‐Lee, Annette, et al.. (2013). The Water, Energy and Food Nexus: Finding the Balance in Infrastructure Investment. AGUFM. 2013.1 indexed citations
10.
Dale, Larry, Dev Millstein, Sebastián Vicuña, et al.. (2013). Energy-Water Integrated Assessment of the Sacramento Area and a Demonstration of WEAP-LEAP Capability. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2013.2 indexed citations
11.
Nilsson, Måns, Charles Heaps, Åsa Persson, et al.. (2012). Energy for a Shared Development Agenda: Global Scenarios and Governance Implications. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis). 1–131.15 indexed citations
12.
Heaps, Charles, Jack Sieber, David Purkey, & Marion Davis. (2012). Integrating the WEAP and LEAP systems to support planning and analysis at the water-energy nexus.5 indexed citations
13.
Howells, Mark, Holger Rogner, Neil Strachan, et al.. (2011). OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System. Energy Policy. 39(10). 5850–5870.576 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Heaps, Charles, Michael Lazarus, & Peter Erickson. (2009). Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Developing Countries - Promising Options in China, Mexico, India, Brazil, South Africa, and South Korea.2 indexed citations
15.
Heaps, Charles, Peter Erickson, Sivan Kartha, & Eric Kemp‐Benedict. (2009). Europe’s Share of the Climate Challenge.11 indexed citations
16.
Kollmuss, Anja & Charles Heaps. (2008). UNFCCC Resource Guide for Preparing the National Communications of non-Annex I Parties. Module 4: Measures to Mitigate Climate Change.8 indexed citations
17.
Lazarus, Michael, et al.. (2004). Turning the Corner on Global Warming Emissions: An Analysis of Ten Strategies for California, Oregon, and Washington.5 indexed citations
Heaps, Charles, et al.. (1999). Sustainable Development in West Africa: Beginning the Process.1 indexed citations
20.
Heaps, Charles, Eric Kemp‐Benedict, & Paul Raskin. (1998). Conventional Worlds: Technical Description of Bending the Curve Scenarios.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.