Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach
2011937 citationsMorgan Bazilian, Holger Rogner et al.Energy Policyprofile →
OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System
2011576 citationsMark Howells, Holger Rogner et al.Energy Policyprofile →
Integrated analysis of climate change, land-use, energy and water strategies
2013496 citationsMark Howells, Sebastian Hermann et al.Nature Climate Changeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Rogner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Rogner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Rogner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Rogner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Rogner. The network helps show where Holger Rogner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Holger Rogner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Holger Rogner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Holger Rogner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Holger Rogner. Holger Rogner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mentis, Dimitrios, Mark Howells, Holger Rogner, et al.. (2017). Linking the open source, spatial electrification tool (ONSSET) and the open source energy modelling system (OSeMOSYS), with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa. EGUGA. 15758.2 indexed citations
Shihab‐Eldin, Adnan & Holger Rogner. (2015). The case for nuclear power in the Middle East and North Africa. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 96.1 indexed citations
Howells, Mark, Sebastian Hermann, Manuel Welsch, et al.. (2013). Integrated analysis of climate change, land-use, energy and water strategies. Nature Climate Change. 3(7). 621–626.496 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Bazilian, Morgan, Holger Rogner, Mark Howells, et al.. (2011). Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy. 39(12). 7896–7906.937 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Howells, Mark, Holger Rogner, Neil Strachan, et al.. (2011). OSeMOSYS: The Open Source Energy Modeling System. Energy Policy. 39(10). 5850–5870.576 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Rogner, Holger. (2010). Nuclear Power and Sustainable Development. Journal of international affairs. 64(1). 137.18 indexed citations
18.
Kononov, S.A., et al.. (2002). Market Potential for Non-electric Applications of Nuclear Energy. Journal of the California Dental Association. 43(9). 486–486.9 indexed citations
19.
Rogner, Holger, et al.. (2001). Nuclear power: status and outlook. 46(12). 25–30.
20.
Nakićenović, N. & Holger Rogner. (1995). Global Financing Needs for Long-Term Energy Perspectives. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.