Charles F. Beam
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Materials Chemistry
- Pharmaceutical Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Charles R. HauserRobert S. FooteRichard A. SchwarzAllen C. ChurchDouglas R. HurstDean C. DuncanMargaret A. HinesAngela Williams
- Topics
- Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (33 papers)Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (30 papers)Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (26 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Organic ChemistryIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Charles F. Beam
82 papers receiving 738 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Organic Chemistry 727
- Pharmacology 200
- Molecular Biology 125
- Materials Chemistry 47
- Pharmaceutical Science 42
Countries citing papers authored by Charles F. Beam
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles F. Beam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles F. Beam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles F. Beam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles F. Beam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles F. Beam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles F. Beam. The network helps show where Charles F. Beam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles F. Beam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles F. Beam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles F. Beam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles F. Beam. Charles F. Beam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Charles F. Beam
Charles F. Beam is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 88 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (33 papers), Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (30 papers) and Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (727 citations), Pharmacology (200 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (42 citations). Charles F. Beam has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles R. Hauser, Robert S. Foote, Richard A. Schwarz, Allen C. Church, Douglas R. Hurst, Dean C. Duncan, Margaret A. Hines, Angela Williams, Howard L. Hall and William T. Pennington. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.