Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationships
19583.4k citationsCharles D. Michener et al.profile →
Principles of Systematic Zoology.
19691.5k citationsCharles D. Michener et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Charles D. Michener
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles D. Michener's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles D. Michener with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles D. Michener more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles D. Michener
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles D. Michener. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles D. Michener. The network helps show where Charles D. Michener may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles D. Michener
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles D. Michener.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles D. Michener based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles D. Michener. Charles D. Michener is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Engel, Michael S., Víctor H. González, & Charles D. Michener. (2014). <i>Journal of Melittology</i>: First year ‘abuzz’. Latin American Theatre Review (The University of Kansas). 1–6.1 indexed citations
2.
Ricketts, Taylor H., Gretchen C. Daily, Paul R. Ehrlich, & Charles D. Michener. (2004). Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101(34). 12579–12582.521 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Michener, Charles D.. (1996). A Review of the Genera of Brachynomadini and a New South American Genus (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Nomadinae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 69(1). 87.4 indexed citations
4.
Michener, Charles D.. (1995). A Classification of the Bees of the Subfamily Xeromelissinae (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 68(3). 332.11 indexed citations
5.
Michener, Charles D.. (1993). The Status of Prosopalictus, a Halictine Bee from Taiwan (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 61(1). 67–72.5 indexed citations
6.
Maeta, Yasuo, Shôichi F. Sakagami, & Charles D. Michener. (1992). Laboratory studies on the behavior and colony structure of Braunsapis hewitti, a Xylocopine bee from Taiwan (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). 54(9). 289–333.17 indexed citations
7.
Michener, Charles D.. (1988). The Genus Lithurge in the Antilles (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 76. 159.5 indexed citations
8.
Michener, Charles D., et al.. (1987). An African genus of cleptoparasitic halictid bees (Hymenoptera, Halictidae).. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 60(2). 324–329.5 indexed citations
9.
Brooks, Robert W. & Charles D. Michener. (1985). Nests of Tetralonia lepida (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 58(3). 559.1 indexed citations
Michener, Charles D., et al.. (1977). The Seasonal Cycle and Habitat of a Tropical Bumble Bee. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 17(3). 237.14 indexed citations
12.
Michener, Charles D.. (1975). Larvae of African Allodapine Bees. 1. The genus Allodape (Hymenoptera: Xylocopinae). Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 38(1). 1–12.4 indexed citations
13.
Michener, Charles D.. (1968). Heriades Spiniscutis, A Bee that Facultatively Omits Partitions Between Rearing Cells (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 41(4). 484.5 indexed citations
14.
Michener, Charles D.. (1966). A new genus of ceratinine bees from the Red Sea area (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 39(4). 372.6 indexed citations
15.
Michener, Charles D.. (1963). Observations on the Bionomics of a Colonial Bee of the Genus Perdita (Hymenoptera: Apoidea, Panurginae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 36(2). 114.4 indexed citations
16.
Michener, Charles D., et al.. (1958). Observations on the Behavior of Brasilian Halictid Bees II: Paroxystoglossa Jocasta. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 31(2). 129.3 indexed citations
17.
Michener, Charles D.. (1955). Some Biological Observations on Hoplitis pilosifrons and Stelis lateralis (Hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 28(3). 81.12 indexed citations
18.
Michener, Charles D.. (1954). A Genus of Bees New to the Illinois Region. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 27(1). 13.4 indexed citations
19.
Michener, Charles D.. (1954). Melecta Pacifica Atlantica in the Central United States (Hymenoptera, Anthophorinae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 27(3). 120.1 indexed citations
20.
Michener, Charles D.. (1952). A New Genus of Panurgine Bees from Arizona (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 25(1). 24.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.