Charles C. Doane
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael L. McManusRing T. CardéDavid E. LeonardWendell L. RoelofsJ. GranettThomas C. BakerW. RoelofsPaul W. Schaefer
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers)Insect Pheromone Research and Control (13 papers)Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Charles C. Doane
34 papers receiving 884 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Insect Science 744
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 374
- Ecology 316
- Molecular Biology 238
- Genetics 229
Countries citing papers authored by Charles C. Doane
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles C. Doane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles C. Doane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles C. Doane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles C. Doane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles C. Doane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles C. Doane. The network helps show where Charles C. Doane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles C. Doane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles C. Doane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles C. Doane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles C. Doane. Charles C. Doane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The gypsy moth : research toward integrated pest managementbreakdown → | 449 |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | Aerial application of insecticides for control of the gypsy moth | 3 |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 62 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | Bacterial pathogens of Scolytus multistriatus Marsham as related to crowding. | 3 |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Charles C. Doane
Charles C. Doane is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (13 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (744 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (374 citations) and Ecology (316 citations). Charles C. Doane has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Michael L. McManus, Ring T. Cardé, David E. Leonard, Wendell L. Roelofs, J. Granett, Thomas C. Baker, W. Roelofs, Paul W. Schaefer, Jan Kochansky and Donald G. Farnum. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Economic Entomology and Journal of Invertebrate Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.