Charles Brooke

423 total citations
9 papers, 251 citations indexed

About

Charles Brooke is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles Brooke has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 251 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 3 papers in Plant Science and 2 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Charles Brooke's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (5 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers). Charles Brooke is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (5 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers). Charles Brooke collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Saudi Arabia. Charles Brooke's co-authors include Matthias Hess, Breanna M. Roque, Joan King Salwen, E. Kebreab, Pramod Pandey, Robert D. Kinley, Tamsen Polley, Joshua Ladau, Emiley A. Eloe‐Fadrosh and Claire Shaw and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Frontiers in Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Charles Brooke

9 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Charles Brooke United States	6	128	77	41	38	35	9	251
M.E. Fetter United States	9	252 2.0×	51 0.7×	33 0.8×	24 0.6×	31 0.9×	13	326
Stephanie A. Terry Canada	12	230 1.8×	67 0.9×	30 0.7×	17 0.4×	76 2.2×	35	415
D.E. Wasson United States	10	262 2.0×	34 0.4×	34 0.8×	34 0.9×	32 0.9×	17	362
H. Stefenoni United States	9	217 1.7×	35 0.5×	31 0.8×	24 0.6×	26 0.7×	12	284
Christopher Gardiner Australia	10	174 1.4×	27 0.4×	28 0.7×	5 0.1×	62 1.8×	43	373
Eliane Cristina Gruszka Vendruscolo Brazil	12	71 0.6×	167 2.2×	16 0.4×	13 0.3×	454 13.0×	26	581
J. Velazco Uruguay	13	213 1.7×	22 0.3×	18 0.4×	3 0.1×	18 0.5×	30	405
Sheila Zambello de Pinho Brazil	10	41 0.3×	124 1.6×	15 0.4×	10 0.3×	287 8.2×	42	418
Diogo Fleury Azevedo Costa Australia	10	224 1.8×	18 0.2×	23 0.6×	24 0.6×	28 0.8×	52	351
Mohammad Farhad Vahidi Iran	5	156 1.2×	112 1.5×	47 1.1×	2 0.1×	43 1.2×	7	299

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Brooke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Brooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Brooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Brooke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Brooke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Brooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Brooke. The network helps show where Charles Brooke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Brooke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Brooke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Brooke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Brooke. Charles Brooke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Rappuoli, Rino, Nguyen K. Nguyen, David E. Bloom, et al.. (2025). Microbes can capture carbon and degrade plastic — why aren’t we using them more?. Nature. 639(8056). 864–866. 1 indexed citations

Park, Yuna, et al.. (2023). A Comparison of Three Artificial Rumen Systems for Rumen Microbiome Modeling. Fermentation. 9(11). 953–953. 11 indexed citations

Hagen, Live H., Charles Brooke, Claire Shaw, et al.. (2020). Proteome specialization of anaerobic fungi during ruminal degradation of recalcitrant plant fiber. The ISME Journal. 15(2). 421–434. 71 indexed citations

Shaw, Claire, Charles Brooke, Miranda Harmon‐Smith, et al.. (2020). Phototrophic Co-cultures From Extreme Environments: Community Structure and Potential Value for Fundamental and Applied Research. Frontiers in Microbiology. 11. 572131–572131. 4 indexed citations

Brooke, Charles, Breanna M. Roque, Claire Shaw, et al.. (2020). Methane Reduction Potential of Two Pacific Coast Macroalgae During in vitro Ruminant Fermentation. Frontiers in Marine Science. 7. 32 indexed citations

Brooke, Charles, et al.. (2019). Prevotella copri , a potential indicator for high feed efficiency in western steers. Animal Science Journal. 90(5). 696–701. 18 indexed citations

Chang, Changsoo, Charles Brooke, Hailan Piao, et al.. (2019). A 2.08 Å resolution structure of HLB5, a novel cellulase from the anaerobic gut bacterium Parabacteroides johnsonii DSM 18315. Protein Science. 28(4). 794–799. 5 indexed citations

Roque, Breanna M., Charles Brooke, Joshua Ladau, et al.. (2019). Effect of the macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis on methane production and rumen microbiome assemblage. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 3–3. 108 indexed citations

Roque, Breanna M., Charles Brooke, Joshua Ladau, et al.. (2019). Correction to: Effect of the macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis on methane production and rumen microbiome assemblage. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact