Charles Babin

17 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Charles Babin
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Materials Chemistry 216
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 4
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 124
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 193
  • Genetics 69
Replace Wee Hao Ng with:
Wee Hao Ng United States
David O. Bracher United States
M. Oliva-Leyva Mexico
Rick Leijssen Netherlands
Ž. Zobenica Netherlands
Klaus D. Sattler United Kingdom
Masahiro Hori Japan
Xinghan Chen China
Edward M. Nelson United States
Sam Ladak United Kingdom
Charles Babin relative to Wee Hao Ng United States Wee Hao Ng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Wee Hao Ng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Babin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Babin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Babin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Babin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Babin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Babin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Babin. The network helps show where Charles Babin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Babin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Babin Line = papers co-authored together Charles Babin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2020124
2 201991
3 202066
4 201839
5 201735
6 202115
7 202213
8 202212
9 202112
10 202011
11 20248
12 20235
13 20202
14 20152
15 19891
16 20121
17 20171
18 20250
19 20240
20 20250

About Charles Babin

Charles Babin is a scholar working on Genetics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (6 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (3 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (3 papers) and Polymer crystallization and properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (216 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (4 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (124 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (193 citations) and Genetics (69 citations). Charles Babin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Florian Kaiser, Naoya Morioka, Jörg Wrachtrup, Matthias Niethammer, Louis Bernatchez, Matthias Widmann, Nguyên Tiên Són, Jawad Ul‐Hassan, Roland Nagy and D. D. Awschalom. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics, Nature Communications, Nano Letters and Molecular Ecology Resources.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact