Chao Xi

64 papers receiving 800 citations

Peers

Chao Xi
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 29
  • Insect Science 110
  • Plant Science 329
  • Developmental Biology 15
  • Accounting 62
Replace Ling Wang with:
Ling Wang China
Yunping Wang China
Markus Nießen Switzerland
Francesca Di Renzo Italy
Dorota Kotowska Poland
Manish Mishra India
Stefania De Domenico Italy
Ekaterina Proshkina Russia
Qingqing Yang China
Chao Xi relative to Ling Wang China Ling Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Ling Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chao Xi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chao Xi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chao Xi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chao Xi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chao Xi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chao Xi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chao Xi. The network helps show where Chao Xi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chao Xi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chao Xi Line = papers co-authored together Chao Xi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201978
2 201961
3 202152
4 201452
5 201146
6 201646
7
In Search of an Effective Monitoring Board Model: Board Reforms and the Political Economy of Corporate Law in China
200739
8 202031
9 201026
10 201222
11 201721
12 202120
13 202020
14 202219
15 202019
16 202117
17 201417
18 201914
19
Institutional Shareholder Activism in China: Law and Practice
200613
20
Data-Driven Approaches to Studying Chinese Judicial Practice: Opportunities, Challenges, and Issues
201913

About Chao Xi

Chao Xi is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Accounting, Ecology and Law, having authored 75 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Insolvency and Governance (7 papers), Marine animal studies overview (6 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (6 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (5 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (5 papers) and Legal principles and applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (29 citations), Insect Science (110 citations), Plant Science (329 citations), Developmental Biology (15 citations) and Accounting (62 citations). Chao Xi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xue Pang, Yi-Xi Feng, Tiemei Zhang, Huan Gong, Jing Pang, Shu-Shan Du, Shengcheng Han, Yingdian Wang, Heping Zhao and Ju Cui. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Plant Physiology, PLoS ONE, Brain Research, Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry and European Business Organization Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact