Chang-Te Lin

29 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Chang-Te Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Urology 35
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 177
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 33
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 74
  • Nephrology 23
Replace Christopher Cheng with:
Christopher Cheng Singapore
Bingbing Hou China
Yunkai Zhu China
Jennifer Linehan United States
Viktoria Stühler Germany
Arun Rai United States
Andreas Thorstenson Sweden
Guangcheng Dai China
Hongmei Zhang China
Peter Downey Australia
Chang-Te Lin relative to Christopher Cheng Singapore Christopher Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.5×
Christopher Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chang-Te Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chang-Te Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang-Te Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang-Te Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chang-Te Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang-Te Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang-Te Lin. The network helps show where Chang-Te Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chang-Te Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chang-Te Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chang-Te Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200448
2 201537
3 200428
4 200926
5 200625
6
The correlation between TWIST, E-cadherin, and beta-catenin in human bladder cancer.
201222
7 200521
8 200719
9 201619
10 201013
11 200913
12 201611
13 20128
14 19987
15 20096
16
A simple means of making the differential diagnosis of ureterouterine and vesicouterine fistula.
19986
17 20096
18 20086
19
Analysis of the effects of cyproheptadine on bladder cancer through big data.
20205
20 20075

About Chang-Te Lin

Chang-Te Lin is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Archeology, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (14 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (6 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (4 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (3 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (2 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers) and Foreign Body Medical Cases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (35 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (177 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (33 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (74 citations) and Nephrology (23 citations). Chang-Te Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Yeong‐Chin Jou, Pi-Che Chen, Ming-Chin Cheng, Cheng‐Huang Shen, Deching Chang, Cheng‐Da Hsu, Hsiao‐Yen Hsieh, Shumei Lin, Yi‐Wen Liu and Shu-Fen Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, Journal of Endourology, Cancer Letters, Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology and BMC Nephrology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact