Changju Qu

70 total papers · 1.1k total citations
38 papers, 537 citations indexed

About

Changju Qu is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Changju Qu has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 537 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Oncology, 15 papers in Molecular Biology and 13 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Changju Qu's work include CAR-T cell therapy research (13 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (8 papers). Changju Qu is often cited by papers focused on CAR-T cell therapy research (13 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (8 papers). Changju Qu collaborates with scholars based in China, United States and Pakistan. Changju Qu's co-authors include Ruiying Zhao, Mong‐Hong Lee, Huiling Yang, Jia-Ling Huang, Sumei Wang, Yadong Liu, Xudan Wang, Francisco Vega, Rong Zhang and Zhihui Liang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood and Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Changju Qu

33 papers receiving 534 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Changju Qu	317	246	165	72	61	38	537
H. Roché	177 0.6×	251 1.0×	103 0.6×	49 0.7×	49 0.8×	35	597
Chenggong Li	245 0.8×	383 1.6×	68 0.4×	120 1.7×	105 1.7×	35	553
Mohsen Sheykhhasan	208 0.7×	174 0.7×	123 0.7×	38 0.5×	86 1.4×	32	533
Yan Sun	247 0.8×	97 0.4×	193 1.2×	26 0.4×	62 1.0×	33	496
Xinjie Xu	159 0.5×	285 1.2×	52 0.3×	117 1.6×	98 1.6×	35	478
Federica Guffanti	370 1.2×	298 1.2×	143 0.9×	26 0.4×	37 0.6×	32	574
Lovely Goyal	223 0.7×	334 1.4×	41 0.2×	75 1.0×	141 2.3×	28	505
Kai Hu	217 0.7×	129 0.5×	106 0.6×	29 0.4×	39 0.6×	59	451
Jianqiu Wu	127 0.4×	259 1.1×	67 0.4×	34 0.5×	112 1.8×	35	487
Lida Pacaud	243 0.8×	515 2.1×	45 0.3×	57 0.8×	81 1.3×	55	612

Countries citing papers authored by Changju Qu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Changju Qu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Changju Qu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Changju Qu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Changju Qu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Changju Qu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Changju Qu. The network helps show where Changju Qu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Changju Qu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Changju Qu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Changju Qu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Changju Qu. Changju Qu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact