Chandishwar Nath
- Physiology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Rakesh ShuklaRahul AgrawalPradip K. KamatEthika TyagiSantoshkumar TotaKashif HanifShivika RaiSupriya Swarnkar
- Topics
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (21 papers)Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (19 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBrain ResearchJournal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesPoland
In The Last Decade
Chandishwar Nath
84 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Physiology 1.6k
- Molecular Biology 1.4k
- Pharmacology 1.2k
- Neurology 1.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 946
Countries citing papers authored by Chandishwar Nath
This map shows the geographic impact of Chandishwar Nath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chandishwar Nath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chandishwar Nath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chandishwar Nath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chandishwar Nath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chandishwar Nath. The network helps show where Chandishwar Nath may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chandishwar Nath
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chandishwar Nath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chandishwar Nath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chandishwar Nath. Chandishwar Nath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 46 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 84 | |
| 12 | 79 | |
| 13 | 118 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 103 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Chandishwar Nath
Chandishwar Nath is a scholar working on Neurology, Biological Psychiatry and Pharmacology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (21 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (19 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (435 citations), Neurology (1.1k citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (899 citations). Chandishwar Nath has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Rakesh Shukla, Rahul Agrawal, Pradip K. Kamat, Ethika Tyagi, Santoshkumar Tota, Kashif Hanif, Shivika Rai, Supriya Swarnkar, Gunjan Saxena and N. Rajasekar. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Brain Research and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.