Chadwick Casper
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Neutrino Physics Research
Papers in
-
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 3
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 1
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 1
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 1
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 1
- Co-authors
- S. B. Cenko (2 shared papers)J. M. Silverman (2 shared papers)Jon C. Mauerhan (2 shared papers)Nathan Smith (2 shared papers)Gary Li (3 shared papers)P. K. Blanchard (1 shared paper)K. I. Clubb (2 shared papers)Daniel P. Cohen (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2 papers)arXiv (Cornell University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungary
In The Last Decade
Chadwick Casper
3 papers receiving 168 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 13
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 182
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 63
- Instrumentation 10
- Biophysics 2
- Oceanography 2
Countries citing papers authored by Chadwick Casper
This map shows the geographic impact of Chadwick Casper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chadwick Casper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chadwick Casper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chadwick Casper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chadwick Casper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chadwick Casper. The network helps show where Chadwick Casper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Chadwick Casper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 177 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 3 | The Unprecedented Third Outburst of SN 2009ip: A Luminous Blue Variable Becomes a Supernova | 2012 | 1 |
About Chadwick Casper
Chadwick Casper is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 3 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (3 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (1 paper), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (1 paper) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (182 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (63 citations), Instrumentation (10 citations), Biophysics (2 citations) and Oceanography (2 citations). Chadwick Casper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include S. B. Cenko, J. M. Silverman, Jon C. Mauerhan, Nathan Smith, Gary Li, P. K. Blanchard, K. I. Clubb, Daniel P. Cohen, A. V. Filippenko and Schuyler D. Van Dyk. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and arXiv (Cornell University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.