Cemal Köse
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Media Technology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Uğur ŞevikHidayet ErdölMete YağanoğluFatih GürcanTemel KayıkçıoğluFerhat BozkurtÖzcan ÖzyurtAhmet Sarı
- Topics
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis (19 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (15 papers)Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
Cemal Köse
68 papers receiving 940 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 423
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 405
- Ophthalmology 267
- Artificial Intelligence 174
- Media Technology 121
Countries citing papers authored by Cemal Köse
This map shows the geographic impact of Cemal Köse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cemal Köse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cemal Köse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cemal Köse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cemal Köse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cemal Köse. The network helps show where Cemal Köse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cemal Köse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cemal Köse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cemal Köse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cemal Köse. Cemal Köse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | Multi-focus image fusion using Stationary Wavelet Transform (SWT) with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) | 17 |
| 13 | Comparison of seeded region growing and random walk methods for vessel and bone segmentation in CTA images | 4 |
| 14 | Analysis of software engineering industry needs and trends: implications for education | 24 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | Comparing 2D matched filter response and Gabor filter methods for vessel segmentation in retinal images | 5 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Cemal Köse
Cemal Köse is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Signal Processing, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (19 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (15 papers) and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (267 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (423 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (405 citations). Cemal Köse has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, France and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Uğur Şevik, Hidayet Erdöl, Mete Yağanoğlu, Fatih Gürcan, Temel Kayıkçıoğlu, Ferhat Bozkurt, Özcan Özyurt, Ahmet Sarı, İbrahi̇m Alp and Zeynep Turgut. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Sensors and Applied Soft Computing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.