Celia Taylor

2.5k citations
40 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 21

Celia Taylor

39 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Celia Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Clinical Psychology 617
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 317
  • Epidemiology 710
  • General Health Professions 435
  • Applied Psychology 74
Replace Yonette F. Thomas with:
Yonette F. Thomas United States
Vivek Benegal India
Gerardo González United States
R.J. Frances United States
Ladislav Csémy Czechia
Gerald Bennett United Kingdom
Morten Hesse Denmark
Henrick J. Harwood United States
Daniela Piontek Germany
Maureen Reynolds United States
Celia Taylor relative to Yonette F. Thomas United States Yonette F. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Yonette F. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Taylor. The network helps show where Celia Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celia Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Celia Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Celia Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2 20193
3 201518
4 20126
5 200336
6 200387
7 2003111
8 2002140
9 2002125
10 200163
11 199915
12 19973
13
Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter?
1997201
14 19955
15 199440
16 199472
17 199014
18 198560
19 197821
20 196945

About Celia Taylor

Celia Taylor is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (13 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (11 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (617 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (317 citations), Epidemiology (710 citations), General Health Professions (435 citations) and Applied Psychology (74 citations). Celia Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Bulgaria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Griffith Edwards, John Strang, Ann Deehan, Edna Oppenheimer, Ann Hawker, L Templeton, Jim Orford, Celia Hensman, Colin Drummond and Martin Mitcheson. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, International Review of Psychiatry, Addiction, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026