Célia Henriques
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 2%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
Papers in
- Biomaterials 21
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 19
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications 7
- biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties 4
-
- Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials 7
- Co-authors
- Jorge Silva (17 shared papers)S.R. Gomes (5 shared papers)Gabriela Rodrigues (3 shared papers)Gabriel G. Martins (3 shared papers)João Paulo Borges (13 shared papers)Manuela Mafra (1 shared paper)Tânia Vieira (9 shared papers)José Luís Ferreira (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Célia Henriques
28 papers receiving 858 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Biomaterials 617
- Rehabilitation 128
- Polymers and Plastics 127
- Biomedical Engineering 396
- Molecular Medicine 27
Countries citing papers authored by Célia Henriques
This map shows the geographic impact of Célia Henriques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Célia Henriques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Célia Henriques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Célia Henriques
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Célia Henriques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Célia Henriques. The network helps show where Célia Henriques may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Célia Henriques, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 218 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 127 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 85 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 8 |
About Célia Henriques
Célia Henriques is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Polymers and Plastics, Materials Chemistry and Rehabilitation, having authored 30 papers that have together received 877 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (19 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (7 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (4 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (3 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (617 citations), Rehabilitation (128 citations), Polymers and Plastics (127 citations), Biomedical Engineering (396 citations) and Molecular Medicine (27 citations). Célia Henriques has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Belgium and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jorge Silva, S.R. Gomes, Gabriela Rodrigues, Gabriel G. Martins, João Paulo Borges, Manuela Mafra, Tânia Vieira, José Luís Ferreira, Carlos Fiolhais and Ilda Santos‐Sanches. Their work appears in journals such as Polymers, Materials Science and Engineering C, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Progress in Surface Science and Materials Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.