Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Physiology
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Helen E. ConnorBrian MorrisDavid LodgeCaterina BendottiUrsula BoschertRobin J. DickinsonMichela TessariStefan Catsicas
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy
23 papers receiving 535 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 320
- Molecular Biology 281
- Pharmacology 99
- Physiology 87
- Cell Biology 84
Countries citing papers authored by Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy
This map shows the geographic impact of Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy. The network helps show where Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy. Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 109 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 92 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy
Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (320 citations), Sensory Systems (35 citations) and Physiology (28 citations). Celestine T. O’Shaughnessy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Helen E. Connor, Brian Morris, David Lodge, Caterina Bendotti, Ursula Boschert, Robin J. Dickinson, Michela Tessari, Stefan Catsicas, Emilio Merlo Pich and Christopher J. Pycock. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Brain Research and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.