Celestine N. Mercer
- Geophysics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 5%
- Atmospheric Science
- Co-authors
- Juliane GroßA. H. TreimanKathryn E. WattsC. M. MercerM. H. ReedAlbert H. HofstraDavid AdamsTodor I. Todorov
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (13 papers)Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (8 papers)earthquake and tectonic studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- Geochimica et Cosmochimica ActaEarth and Planetary Science LettersGeophysical Research Letters
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoAustralia
In The Last Decade
Celestine N. Mercer
19 papers receiving 565 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Geophysics 403
- Artificial Intelligence 227
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 142
- Geochemistry and Petrology 92
- Atmospheric Science 77
Countries citing papers authored by Celestine N. Mercer
This map shows the geographic impact of Celestine N. Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celestine N. Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celestine N. Mercer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celestine N. Mercer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celestine N. Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celestine N. Mercer. The network helps show where Celestine N. Mercer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celestine N. Mercer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celestine N. Mercer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celestine N. Mercer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celestine N. Mercer. Celestine N. Mercer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 77 | |
| 10 | 66 | |
| 11 | 110 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 76 | |
| 16 | Sinking the Lunar Magma Ocean: New Evidence from Meteorites and the Return of Serial Magmatism | 1 |
| 17 | Lunar Feldspathic Meteorites: Constraints on the Geology of the Lunar Farside Highlands, and the Origin of the Lunar Crust | 3 |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Celestine N. Mercer
Celestine N. Mercer is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 20 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (13 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (8 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (403 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (92 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (142 citations). Celestine N. Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Juliane Groß, A. H. Treiman, Kathryn E. Watts, C. M. Mercer, M. H. Reed, Albert H. Hofstra, David Adams, Todor I. Todorov, Arthur Johnston and Jonathan M. Castro. Their work appears in journals such as Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Earth and Planetary Science Letters and Geophysical Research Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.