Celeste McBride
Impact in
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Genetics top 10%
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Papers in
- Genetics 3
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 2
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 1
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 1
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 1
- Co-authors
- Arnold OliphantRichard ShenJian‐Bing FanMarina BibikovaBahram G. KermaniJing ChenFrank J. SteemersKevin L. Gunderson
- Journals
- Genome Research (1 paper)Nature Methods (1 paper)Prenatal Diagnosis (1 paper)Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Celeste McBride
4 papers receiving 676 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 208
- Genetics 244
- Cancer Research 79
- Molecular Biology 327
- Infectious Diseases 81
Countries citing papers authored by Celeste McBride
This map shows the geographic impact of Celeste McBride's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celeste McBride with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celeste McBride more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celeste McBride
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celeste McBride. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celeste McBride. The network helps show where Celeste McBride may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Celeste McBride, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 208 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 299 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 148 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 49 |
About Celeste McBride
Celeste McBride is a scholar working on Genetics, Cancer Research, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 4 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (2 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1 paper), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (1 paper), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1 paper), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (1 paper) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (208 citations), Genetics (244 citations), Cancer Research (79 citations), Molecular Biology (327 citations) and Infectious Diseases (81 citations). Celeste McBride has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Arnold Oliphant, Richard Shen, Jian‐Bing Fan, Marina Bibikova, Bahram G. Kermani, Jing Chen, Frank J. Steemers, Kevin L. Gunderson, Weihua Chang and Francisco García‐García. Their work appears in journals such as Genome Research, Nature Methods, Prenatal Diagnosis and Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.