Celeste E. Coltman

664 total citations
39 papers, 447 citations indexed

About

Celeste E. Coltman is a scholar working on Surgery, Occupational Therapy and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Celeste E. Coltman has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 447 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Occupational Therapy and 9 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Celeste E. Coltman's work include Occupational Health and Performance (12 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (10 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers). Celeste E. Coltman is often cited by papers focused on Occupational Health and Performance (12 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (10 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers). Celeste E. Coltman collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Celeste E. Coltman's co-authors include Julie R. Steele, Deirdre E. McGhee, Wayne Spratford, Nick Ball, Isabel S. Moore, G Donnelly, Catherine Paterson, Monica L. H. Jones, Leia Stirling and Kellie Toohey and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Journal of Biomechanics.

In The Last Decade

Celeste E. Coltman

36 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Celeste E. Coltman Australia 14 140 128 95 80 76 39 447
Wendy Hedger United Kingdom 9 186 1.3× 85 0.7× 79 0.8× 51 0.6× 48 0.6× 11 457
X Phélip France 12 143 1.0× 218 1.7× 66 0.7× 158 2.0× 231 3.0× 59 560
Kota Miyoshi Japan 14 435 3.1× 49 0.4× 42 0.4× 61 0.8× 167 2.2× 31 677
Anne Frisch Germany 10 139 1.0× 20 0.2× 18 0.2× 118 1.5× 48 0.6× 22 448
Joseph P. O’Brien United States 10 848 6.1× 21 0.2× 31 0.3× 40 0.5× 60 0.8× 18 916
Jamie Ruffing United States 4 98 0.7× 72 0.6× 8 0.1× 42 0.5× 16 0.2× 6 404
Patrick Knott United States 14 1.1k 7.5× 14 0.1× 31 0.3× 62 0.8× 76 1.0× 38 1.2k
Magdalena Weber‐Rajek Poland 11 145 1.0× 13 0.1× 16 0.2× 31 0.4× 35 0.5× 41 384
Alessandra Negrini Italy 14 641 4.6× 11 0.1× 18 0.2× 62 0.8× 60 0.8× 34 722
Steven L. Henry United States 16 528 3.8× 29 0.2× 9 0.1× 42 0.5× 20 0.3× 42 763

Countries citing papers authored by Celeste E. Coltman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celeste E. Coltman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celeste E. Coltman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celeste E. Coltman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celeste E. Coltman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celeste E. Coltman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celeste E. Coltman. The network helps show where Celeste E. Coltman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celeste E. Coltman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celeste E. Coltman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celeste E. Coltman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celeste E. Coltman. Celeste E. Coltman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2025). Soldiers experience fit issues, musculoskeletal pain, and equipment and mobility interference with military body armour. Applied Ergonomics. 130. 104645–104645.
2.
Bennett, Malcolm J., Nicholas A. T. Brown, Wayne Spratford, et al.. (2025). What Is the Effect of Breast Size on Running Economy and Upper Body Biomechanical Factors Contributing to Running Economy?. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 57(11). 2527–2536.
3.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2025). Is There an Association Between Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Running Kinetics, and Pelvic Acceleration in Postpartum Women?. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 41(3). 258–270. 1 indexed citations
5.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2024). Do the feet of male and female netball players differ in shape? Implications for shoe design. Journal of Sports Sciences. 42(6). 483–489. 1 indexed citations
6.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2023). What do male netball players want in their footwear? Design recommendations for netball-specific shoes for men. Applied Ergonomics. 113. 104075–104075. 2 indexed citations
7.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2023). Are male netball players satisfied with the shoes that they wear for netball?. Footwear Science. 15(1). 35–42. 2 indexed citations
8.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2023). Are netball players satisfied with their shoes?. Footwear Science. 15(sup1). 1 indexed citations
9.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2022). Do the Footwear Profiles and Foot-Related Problems Reported by Netball Players Differ Between Males and Females?. Sports Medicine - Open. 8(1). 103–103. 6 indexed citations
10.
Mara, Jocelyn K., et al.. (2022). Women with larger breasts are less satisfied with their breasts: Implications for quality of life and physical activity participation. Women s Health. 18. 892520082–892520082. 4 indexed citations
11.
Summers, Simon J., et al.. (2022). Do thoracoabdominal organ boundaries differ between males and females? Implications for body armour coverage and design. Applied Ergonomics. 106. 103891–103891. 2 indexed citations
12.
Coltman, Celeste E., Deirdre E. McGhee, & Julie R. Steele. (2022). How much error is associated with calculating breast volume from three-dimensional breast scans obtained when women are standing? Implications for bra design and bra fit. Ergonomics. 66(3). 330–337. 1 indexed citations
13.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2021). The effect of fatigue on peak Achilles tendon force in Irish dancing-specific landing tasks. Sports Biomechanics. 23(10). 1552–1565. 6 indexed citations
14.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2021). Can smaller body armour improve thoracolumbar range of motion and reduce interference when female soldiers perform dynamic tasks?. Applied Ergonomics. 98. 103602–103602. 11 indexed citations
15.
Coltman, Celeste E., et al.. (2021). Bra-body armour integration, breast discomfort and breast injury associated with wearing body armour. Ergonomics. 64(12). 1623–1633. 15 indexed citations
16.
Coltman, Celeste E., Julie R. Steele, & Deirdre E. McGhee. (2018). Can breast characteristics predict upper torso musculoskeletal pain?. Clinical Biomechanics. 53. 46–53. 20 indexed citations
17.
Coltman, Celeste E., Julie R. Steele, & Deirdre E. McGhee. (2018). Effects of age and body mass index on breast characteristics: a cluster analysis. Ergonomics. 61(9). 1232–1245. 27 indexed citations
18.
Coltman, Celeste E., Julie R. Steele, & Deirdre E. McGhee. (2018). Does breast size affect how women participate in physical activity?. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 22(3). 324–329. 29 indexed citations
19.
McGhee, Deirdre E., et al.. (2017). Bra band size measurements derived from three-dimensional scans are not accurate in women with large, ptotic breasts. Ergonomics. 61(3). 464–472. 10 indexed citations
20.
Coltman, Celeste E., Julie R. Steele, & Deirdre E. McGhee. (2017). Breast volume is affected by body mass index but not age. Ergonomics. 60(11). 1576–1585. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026