Cédric Colas

657 citations
7 papers · 53 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Cédric Colas

6 papers receiving 53 citations

Peers

Cédric Colas
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Health Informatics 2
  • Cultural Studies 8
  • Artificial Intelligence 27
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 13
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 8
Replace Joshua Rule with:
Joshua Rule United States
Jaap Jumelet Netherlands
Aina Garí Soler France
Federico Sangati Netherlands
Petra M. Vogel France
Giorgio Graffi Italy
Rachel Bawden France
Michael Diercks United States
Kaylee Burns United States
Long Ouyang China
Cédric Colas relative to Joshua Rule United States Joshua Rule's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Joshua Rule · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cédric Colas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cédric Colas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cédric Colas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cédric Colas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cédric Colas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cédric Colas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cédric Colas. The network helps show where Cédric Colas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Cédric Colas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cédric Colas Line = papers co-authored together Cédric Colas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 202222
2 202214
3 20188
4 20205
5 20223
6
Language-Goal Imagination to Foster Creative Exploration in Deep RL
20201
7 20240

About Cédric Colas

Cédric Colas is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 53 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (3 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (1 paper), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Language and cultural evolution (1 paper), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (1 paper) and AI in Service Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (2 citations), Cultural Studies (8 citations), Artificial Intelligence (27 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (13 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (8 citations). Cédric Colas has collaborated with scholars based in France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pierre‐Yves Oudeyer, Olivier Sigaud, Clément Moulin-Frier, A. Aldo Faisal, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Li Weng, Mohamed Chétouani, Katja Hofmann and Peter Ford Dominey. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Nature Machine Intelligence, Spiral (Imperial College London) and arXiv (Cornell University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact