Cécile Jaques
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 3
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 3
- Family Practice top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 3
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 7
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 5
-
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 4
- Nausea and vomiting management 3
-
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 4
- Co-authors
- Antje HorschCamille DeforgesSuzannah StuijfzandVania SandozJolanda ElmersMaya ShahaCédric MabireGiacomo D. Simonetti
- Journals
- BMJ Open (2 papers)International Journal of Nursing Studies (2 papers)JBI Evidence Synthesis (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cécile Jaques
26 papers receiving 511 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Clinical Psychology 219
- Family Practice 21
- General Health Professions 193
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 34
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Countries citing papers authored by Cécile Jaques
This map shows the geographic impact of Cécile Jaques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cécile Jaques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cécile Jaques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cécile Jaques
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cécile Jaques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cécile Jaques. The network helps show where Cécile Jaques may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cécile Jaques, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 50 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 20 |
About Cécile Jaques
Cécile Jaques is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Family Practice, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (219 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), General Health Professions (193 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (34 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Cécile Jaques has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Antje Horsch, Camille Deforges, Suzannah Stuijfzand, Vania Sandoz, Jolanda Elmers, Maya Shaha, Cédric Mabire, Giacomo D. Simonetti, Federica Vanoni and Christopher J. Newman. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal of Nursing Studies, JBI Evidence Synthesis, Anaesthesia and Swiss Medical Weekly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.