Cécile Henquet
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jim van OsLydia KrabbendamRebecca KuepperHans‐Ulrich WïttchenRoselind LiebRobin MurrayJ. SpauwenInez Myin‐Germeys
- Topics
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (22 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (16 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Cécile Henquet
38 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Pharmacology 2.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.7k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 925
- Clinical Psychology 915
- Cognitive Neuroscience 517
Countries citing papers authored by Cécile Henquet
This map shows the geographic impact of Cécile Henquet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cécile Henquet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cécile Henquet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cécile Henquet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cécile Henquet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cécile Henquet. The network helps show where Cécile Henquet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cécile Henquet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cécile Henquet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cécile Henquet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cécile Henquet. Cécile Henquet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 56 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 80 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | DO CANNABIS AND URBANICITY INTERACT IN CAUSING PSYCHOSIS? | 2 |
| 7 | Cannabis use and true incidence of psychotic symptoms in a population-based sample | 0 |
| 8 | 175 | |
| 9 | Evidence that the COMT Val158Met polymorphism moderates sensitivity to stress: An experience-sampling study | 1 |
| 10 | 86 | |
| 11 | 207 | |
| 12 | 54 | |
| 13 | 140 | |
| 14 | 232 | |
| 15 | 167 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 319 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | Prospective cohort study of cannabis use, predisposition for psychosis, and psychotic symptoms in young peoplebreakdown → | 546 |
| 20 | 243 |
About Cécile Henquet
Cécile Henquet is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 40 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (22 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (16 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (2.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.7k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (172 citations). Cécile Henquet has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jim van Os, Lydia Krabbendam, Rebecca Kuepper, Hans‐Ulrich Wïttchen, Roselind Lieb, Robin Murray, J. Spauwen, Inez Myin‐Germeys, Marta Di Forti and Charles D. Kaplan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature reviews. Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.