Cecil Deans

17 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Cecil Deans
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Research and Theory 54
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 25
  • Emergency Medical Services 76
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 39
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 13
Replace Dominika Vrbnjak with:
Dominika Vrbnjak Slovenia
Maram Banakhar Saudi Arabia
Candan Öztürk Türkiye
Kathleen Blais United States
Vicki D. Lachman United States
Fatemeh Hajibabaee Iran
Joan Wagner Canada
Margareta Westerbotn Sweden
Janette Curtis Australia
Mary Val Palumbo United States
Cecil Deans relative to Dominika Vrbnjak Slovenia Dominika Vrbnjak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Dominika Vrbnjak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cecil Deans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecil Deans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecil Deans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecil Deans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecil Deans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecil Deans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecil Deans. The network helps show where Cecil Deans may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Cecil Deans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cecil Deans Line = papers co-authored together Cecil Deans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200685
2 200657
3 200453
4 200550
5 200549
6 200428
7 200426
8 200326
9 200415
10 199914
11 200513
12 200311
13 200810
14
The Tin-Man and the TAM - A Journey Into M-Learning in the Land of Aus
20109
15 19979
16 19956
17
Web-based Decision Support for Structured Reasoning in Health
20044
18 20260
19 20250

About Cecil Deans

Cecil Deans is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers) and Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (54 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (25 citations), Emergency Medical Services (76 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (39 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (13 citations). Cecil Deans has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Morocco and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rasoul Tabari-Khomeiran, John Little, Terence V. McCann, Ke Liu, Lynette Stockhausen, Jun Zhang, Blake Peck, Liming You, Eileen Clark and Dawn Lea. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, Australian journal of advanced nursing and Journal of Gerontological Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact