C.D.M. Griffith

1.4k total citations
27 papers, 980 citations indexed

About

C.D.M. Griffith is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, C.D.M. Griffith has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 980 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cancer Research, 10 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 10 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in C.D.M. Griffith's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers). C.D.M. Griffith is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers). C.D.M. Griffith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Tanzania. C.D.M. Griffith's co-authors include S. Ashley, Irene Boeddinghaus, Geraldine Walsh, Ian E. Smith, Janine Salter, Stephen Francis, Mitch Dowsett, Anthony Skene, Simone Detre and Margaret Hills and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Surgery and Clinical Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

C.D.M. Griffith

27 papers receiving 947 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C.D.M. Griffith United Kingdom 16 512 465 280 255 208 27 980
R R Millis United Kingdom 22 664 1.3× 830 1.8× 513 1.8× 246 1.0× 155 0.7× 32 1.5k
Helena Hwang United States 16 282 0.6× 385 0.8× 309 1.1× 177 0.7× 149 0.7× 38 928
Pandora Ashley United States 3 751 1.5× 583 1.3× 395 1.4× 90 0.4× 134 0.6× 3 1.1k
William D. George United Kingdom 7 397 0.8× 329 0.7× 250 0.9× 101 0.4× 142 0.7× 9 763
Henrik Hellborg Sweden 18 355 0.7× 667 1.4× 111 0.4× 116 0.5× 293 1.4× 24 1.2k
N.J. Bundred United Kingdom 14 199 0.4× 487 1.0× 120 0.4× 219 0.9× 92 0.4× 39 851
Sang Seol Jung South Korea 18 306 0.6× 310 0.7× 277 1.0× 90 0.4× 111 0.5× 75 1.2k
Shunsuke Haga Japan 15 240 0.5× 218 0.5× 189 0.7× 79 0.3× 153 0.7× 82 653
Hugh Carmalt Australia 18 493 1.0× 316 0.7× 507 1.8× 53 0.2× 186 0.9× 48 964
Gunilla Svane Sweden 25 729 1.4× 571 1.2× 611 2.2× 233 0.9× 452 2.2× 58 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by C.D.M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.D.M. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.D.M. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.D.M. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.D.M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.D.M. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.D.M. Griffith. The network helps show where C.D.M. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.D.M. Griffith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.D.M. Griffith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.D.M. Griffith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.D.M. Griffith. C.D.M. Griffith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
White, Victoria, James Harvey, C.D.M. Griffith, Magdy M. Youssef, & Michael Carr. (2011). Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer surgery – Working with the risks of vital blue dye to reap the benefits. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 37(2). 101–108. 26 indexed citations
3.
Macnair, Archie, et al.. (2008). Spiculated lesions of the breast: Radiological estimate of tumour size versus Pathological tumour size- How accurate is radiological measurement?. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 34(10). 1184–1184. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dowsett, Mitch, J. Michael Dixon, Anthony Skene, et al.. (2005). Biomarker Changes During Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or the Combination: Influence of Hormonal Status and HER-2 in Breast Cancer—A Study from the IMPACT Trialists. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 23(11). 2477–2492. 229 indexed citations
5.
Jain, Megha, et al.. (2005). All radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions seen on breast screening mammograms should be excised. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 31(10). 1125–1128. 36 indexed citations
6.
Griffith, C.D.M., et al.. (2004). United Kingdom National Health Service. Cancer Services Collaborative “Improvement Partnership”,. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 30. 1–86. 26 indexed citations
7.
Heer, Rakesh, J Shrimankar, & C.D.M. Griffith. (2003). Granulomatous mastitis can mimic breast cancer on clinical, radiological or cytological examination: a cautionary tale. The Breast. 12(4). 283–286. 89 indexed citations
8.
Aspinall, Sebastian, D. B. Cook, B.K. Shenton, et al.. (2003). Serum adrenal androgens in women with primary operable breast cancer and their relationship with age and body mass index. The Breast. 12(1). 63–71. 5 indexed citations
9.
Wilson, Colin, et al.. (2003). Gynaecomastia, neurofibromatosis and breast cancer. The Breast. 13(1). 77–79. 18 indexed citations
10.
Jha, Madan K., et al.. (2001). Aggressive local treatment for screen-Èdetected DCIS results in very low rates of recurrence. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 27(5). 454–458. 18 indexed citations
11.
Mathers, Marie E., et al.. (2001). The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 54(10). 809–811. 23 indexed citations
12.
Rajan, Prabha, et al.. (1997). p53 protein expression in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 42(3). 283–290. 33 indexed citations
13.
Rubin, Philip, et al.. (1996). Tumour bed biopsy detects the presence of multifocal disease in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for primary breast carcinoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 22(1). 23–26. 12 indexed citations
14.
Berridge, David, C.D.M. Griffith, S S Amar, Brian R. Hopkinson, & G S Makin. (1989). Screening for clinically unsuspected abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with peripheral vascular disease. European Journal of Vascular Surgery. 3(5). 421–422. 20 indexed citations
15.
Griffith, C.D.M., et al.. (1988). Drug points: Purpuric rash associated with slow release morphine. BMJ. 296(6631). 1262–1262. 1 indexed citations
16.
Robertson, C S, C.D.M. Griffith, Mark A. Atkinson, & J D Hardcastle. (1988). Pseudoachalasia of the Cardia: A Review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 81(7). 399–402. 21 indexed citations
17.
Griffith, C.D.M., C S Dowle, C P Hinton, & R.W. Blamey. (1987). The breast pain clinic: a rational approach to classification and treatment of breast pain. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 63(741). 547–549. 22 indexed citations
18.
Griffith, C.D.M., et al.. (1984). The Nature of Enhanced Natural Killer Lymphocyte Cytotoxicity During Anesthesia and Surgery in Patients with Benign Disease and Cancer. Annals of Surgery. 200(6). 747–747. 15 indexed citations
19.
Griffith, C.D.M., A H McLean Ross, & R.G. Clark. (1983). Undernutrition in elective colorectal surgery. Implications for post operative morbidity. Clinical Nutrition. 1(4). 289–295. 2 indexed citations
20.
Griffith, C.D.M., et al.. (1983). O.93 The prognostic value of nutritional indices and dynamometry in patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery. Clinical Nutrition. 2. 49–49. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026