Cathy Curtis
Impact in
- Dermatology top 5%
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Dermatological diseases and infestations
Papers in
- Epidemiology 10
- Nail Diseases and Treatments 10
-
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases 8
- Contact Dermatitis and Allergies 2
- Co-authors
- D. H. Lloyd (4 shared papers)R. Bond (3 shared papers)R. N. White (1 shared paper)A. I. Lamport (1 shared paper)Anke Hendricks (1 shared paper)Anita Patel (1 shared paper)P. E. McNeil (1 shared paper)T. Whitbread (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Veterinary Record (6 papers)Journal of Small Animal Practice (4 papers)Veterinary Dermatology (2 papers)In Practice (2 papers)Veterinary Record Case Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Cathy Curtis
18 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Dermatology 87
- Infectious Diseases 169
- Parasitology 52
- Small Animals 56
- Equine 8
Countries citing papers authored by Cathy Curtis
This map shows the geographic impact of Cathy Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathy Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathy Curtis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cathy Curtis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathy Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathy Curtis. The network helps show where Cathy Curtis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Cathy Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 95 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 18 | Evaluation of the response to intradermally injected environmental mite allergen solutions in healthy kennelled dogs | 1998 | 2 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0 |
About Cathy Curtis
Cathy Curtis is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Dermatology, Infectious Diseases, Insect Science and Small Animals, having authored 21 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nail Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Dermatological diseases and infestations (8 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (8 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (4 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (2 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (2 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (2 papers) and Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (87 citations), Infectious Diseases (169 citations), Parasitology (52 citations), Small Animals (56 citations) and Equine (8 citations). Cathy Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include D. H. Lloyd, R. Bond, R. N. White, A. I. Lamport, Anke Hendricks, Anita Patel, P. E. McNeil, T. Whitbread, P. Bourdeau and Richard A. Bond. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Journal of Small Animal Practice, Veterinary Dermatology, In Practice and Veterinary Record Case Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.