Cathy Anne Pinto

811 total citations
29 papers, 509 citations indexed

About

Cathy Anne Pinto is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Cathy Anne Pinto has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 509 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Cathy Anne Pinto's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers). Cathy Anne Pinto is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers). Cathy Anne Pinto collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Cathy Anne Pinto's co-authors include Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, Chiara Whichello, Isabelle Huys, Bennett Levitan, Jorien Veldwijk, Juhaeri Juhaeri, Eline van Overbeeke, Hayes M. Dansky, Bas Donkers and Vikas Soekhai and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Lipid Research and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Cathy Anne Pinto

27 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cathy Anne Pinto United States 11 159 125 88 86 63 29 509
Jathin Bandari United States 14 55 0.3× 200 1.6× 43 0.5× 32 0.4× 21 0.3× 67 568
Mark Thomas Australia 14 29 0.2× 126 1.0× 34 0.4× 35 0.4× 71 1.1× 38 566
Ruben G. Duijnhoven Netherlands 13 120 0.8× 78 0.6× 23 0.3× 22 0.3× 17 0.3× 36 617
Janet Morgan Canada 11 117 0.7× 116 0.9× 61 0.7× 46 0.5× 135 2.1× 13 1.3k
Joana C. Vasconcelos United Kingdom 18 22 0.1× 182 1.5× 76 0.9× 62 0.7× 32 0.5× 34 905
Jason Cooper United Kingdom 14 26 0.2× 114 0.9× 71 0.8× 21 0.2× 40 0.6× 36 724
J Bruin Rugge United States 5 40 0.3× 81 0.6× 69 0.8× 110 1.3× 18 0.3× 10 588
Martin C. Brown United Kingdom 10 171 1.1× 100 0.8× 80 0.9× 8 0.1× 71 1.1× 27 593
Mugdha Gokhale United States 14 75 0.5× 92 0.7× 28 0.3× 117 1.4× 52 0.8× 31 603
Mary E. Ritchey United States 13 97 0.6× 39 0.3× 31 0.4× 34 0.4× 73 1.2× 32 564

Countries citing papers authored by Cathy Anne Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cathy Anne Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathy Anne Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathy Anne Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cathy Anne Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathy Anne Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathy Anne Pinto. The network helps show where Cathy Anne Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cathy Anne Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cathy Anne Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cathy Anne Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cathy Anne Pinto. Cathy Anne Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vass, Caroline, et al.. (2025). Oncologists’ and urologists’ preferences for adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: a discrete-choice experiment. Future Oncology. 21(7). 833–842. 2 indexed citations
2.
Vass, Caroline, et al.. (2025). Patient preferences for adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: a discrete-choice experiment. Future Oncology. 21(7). 843–851. 2 indexed citations
3.
Vass, Caroline, et al.. (2023). Heterogeneity in physician and patient preferences for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: Evidence from latent class analysis.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 41(6_suppl). 661–661. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pinto, Cathy Anne, Tommi Tervonen, Cecilia Jimenez‐Moreno, et al.. (2023). Current Practices and Challenges When Submitting Patient Experience Data for Regulatory Decisions by the US Food and Drug Administration: An Industry Survey. Patient. 17(2). 147–159. 4 indexed citations
5.
Janssens, Rosanne, Liese Barbier, Irina Cleemput, et al.. (2023). How can patient preferences be used and communicated in the regulatory evaluation of medicinal products? Findings and recommendations from IMI PREFER and call to action. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 14. 1192770–1192770. 5 indexed citations
6.
Pinto, Cathy Anne, et al.. (2023). Regulatory benefit–risk assessment of oncology drugs: A systematic review of FDA and EMA approvals. Drug Discovery Today. 28(10). 103719–103719. 2 indexed citations
7.
Donskov, Frede, Cathy Anne Pinto, Julie Fox, et al.. (2022). Molecular analysis and favorable clinical outcomes in real-world patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Acta Oncologica. 61(10). 1268–1277. 3 indexed citations
8.
Veldwijk, Jorien, Esther W. de Bekker‐Grob, Juhaeri Juhaeri, et al.. (2022). Suitability of Preference Methods Across the Medical Product Lifecycle: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Value in Health. 26(4). 579–588. 3 indexed citations
9.
Pinto, Cathy Anne, et al.. (2021). Treatment and Overall Survival Among Anti-PD-1-Exposed Advanced Melanoma Patients with Evidence of Disease Progression. Immunotherapy. 14(4). 201–214. 2 indexed citations
10.
11.
Tervonen, Tommi, et al.. (2021). Net clinical benefit of antiplatelet therapy was affected by patient preferences: A personalized benefit-risk assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 144. 84–92.
12.
Russo, Selena, Dario Monzani, Cathy Anne Pinto, et al.. (2021). Taking into Account Patient Preferences: A Consensus Study on the Assessment of Psychological Dimensions Within Patient Preference Studies. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 15. 1331–1345. 6 indexed citations
13.
Whichello, Chiara, Irina Cleemput, Cathy Anne Pinto, et al.. (2020). An overview of critical decision-points in the medical product lifecycle: Where to include patient preference information in the decision-making process?. Health Policy. 124(12). 1325–1332. 23 indexed citations
14.
Pinto, Cathy Anne, Tommi Tervonen, Kevin Marsh, et al.. (2019). Personalized benefit‐risk assessments combining clinical trial and real‐world data provide further insights into which patients may benefit most from therapy: Demonstration for a new oral antiplatelet therapy. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. 28(4). 443–451. 6 indexed citations
15.
Soekhai, Vikas, Chiara Whichello, Bennett Levitan, et al.. (2019). Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review. Drug Discovery Today. 24(7). 1324–1331. 103 indexed citations
16.
Russo, Selena, Chiara Jongerius, Flavia Faccio, et al.. (2019). Understanding Patients' Preferences: A Systematic Review of Psychological Instruments Used in Patients' Preference and Decision Studies. Value in Health. 22(4). 491–501. 58 indexed citations
17.
18.
Pinto, Cathy Anne, Jeanette M. Stafford, Tongtong Wang, et al.. (2018). Changes in diabetes medication regimens and glycemic control in adolescents and young adults with youth-onset type 2 diabetes: The SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Pediatric Diabetes. 19(6). 1065–1072. 12 indexed citations
19.
Pinto, Cathy Anne, Stephen Marcella, David A. August, et al.. (2013). Cardiopulmonary bypass has a modest association with cancer progression: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 13(1). 519–519. 41 indexed citations
20.
Krauss, Ronald M., Cathy Anne Pinto, Yang Liu, et al.. (2011). Changes in lipoprotein subfraction concentration and composition in healthy individuals treated with the CETP inhibitor anacetrapib. Journal of Lipid Research. 53(3). 540–547. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jathin Bandari Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark Thomas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruben G. Duijnhoven Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janet Morgan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joana C. Vasconcelos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jason Cooper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J Bruin Rugge Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martin C. Brown Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mugdha Gokhale Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary E. Ritchey
Rankless by CCL
2026