Cathrin Weiß

2.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
9 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Cathrin Weiß is a scholar working on Information Systems, Software and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Cathrin Weiß has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Information Systems, 5 papers in Software and 4 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Cathrin Weiß's work include Software Engineering Research (6 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (4 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers). Cathrin Weiß is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Research (6 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (4 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers). Cathrin Weiß collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Cathrin Weiß's co-authors include Thomas Zimmermann, Rahul Premraj, Nicolas Bettenburg, Sascha Just, Adrian Schröter, Abraham Bernstein, Panagiotis Karras, Andreas Zeller, Ben Liblit and Cindy Rubio-González and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment and Journal of Physics Conference Series.

In The Last Decade

Cathrin Weiß

9 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

What makes a good bug report? 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 2008 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cathrin Weiß Germany 7 1.1k 636 546 415 319 9 1.4k
Michael L. Collard United States 20 1.4k 1.3× 762 1.2× 392 0.7× 495 1.2× 159 0.5× 60 1.5k
Radu Marinescu Romania 17 1.9k 1.7× 1.3k 2.0× 534 1.0× 626 1.5× 269 0.8× 41 2.0k
Mark Grechanik United States 22 1.4k 1.3× 799 1.3× 538 1.0× 460 1.1× 270 0.8× 66 1.7k
Tudor Gîrba Switzerland 21 1.6k 1.4× 631 1.0× 543 1.0× 798 1.9× 116 0.4× 67 1.7k
Sarah Nadi Canada 19 1.0k 0.9× 441 0.7× 410 0.8× 563 1.4× 278 0.9× 66 1.3k
Laurence Duchien France 13 1.0k 0.9× 562 0.9× 453 0.8× 483 1.2× 181 0.6× 44 1.2k
A. Cimitile Italy 22 1.2k 1.1× 829 1.3× 359 0.7× 425 1.0× 270 0.8× 69 1.4k
Bogdan Dit United States 17 1.3k 1.1× 591 0.9× 365 0.7× 416 1.0× 122 0.4× 24 1.3k
Malcom Gethers United States 21 1.8k 1.6× 910 1.4× 553 1.0× 508 1.2× 188 0.6× 31 1.9k
Mark Gabel United States 10 1.3k 1.2× 876 1.4× 351 0.6× 443 1.1× 447 1.4× 12 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Cathrin Weiß

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cathrin Weiß's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathrin Weiß with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathrin Weiß more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cathrin Weiß

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathrin Weiß. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathrin Weiß. The network helps show where Cathrin Weiß may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cathrin Weiß

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cathrin Weiß. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cathrin Weiß based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cathrin Weiß. Cathrin Weiß is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Weiß, Cathrin, Cindy Rubio-González, & Ben Liblit. (2015). Database-Backed Program Analysis for Scalable Error Propagation. 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering. 586–597. 13 indexed citations
2.
Mhashilkar, Parag, Gabriele Garzoglio, B. Holzman, et al.. (2012). End-To-End Solution for Integrated Workload and Data Management Using Glidein WMS and Globus Online. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
3.
Mhashilkar, Parag, Zachary Miller, Rajkumar Kettimuthu, et al.. (2012). End-To-End Solution for Integrated Workload and Data Management using GlideinWMS and Globus Online. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 396(3). 32076–32076. 3 indexed citations
4.
Zimmermann, Thomas, Rahul Premraj, Nicolas Bettenburg, et al.. (2010). What Makes a Good Bug Report?. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 36(5). 618–643. 251 indexed citations
5.
Bettenburg, Nicolas, Sascha Just, Adrian Schröter, et al.. (2008). What makes a good bug report?. 308–318. 425 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Weiß, Cathrin, Panagiotis Karras, & Abraham Bernstein. (2008). Hexastore. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment. 1(1). 1008–1019. 345 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Weiß, Cathrin, Rahul Premraj, Thomas Zimmermann, & Andreas Zeller. (2007). Predicting Effort to Fix Software Bugs.. Softwaretechnik-Trends. 27. 13 indexed citations
8.
Bettenburg, Nicolas, Sascha Just, Adrian Schröter, et al.. (2007). Quality of bug reports in Eclipse. 21–25. 87 indexed citations
9.
Weiß, Cathrin, Rahul Premraj, Thomas Zimmermann, & Andreas Zeller. (2007). How Long Will It Take to Fix This Bug?. 1–1. 279 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026