Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Innovation and Foreign Ownership
2012380 citationsMaría Guadalupe, Olga Kuzmina et al.American Economic Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Thomas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Thomas. The network helps show where Catherine Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Thomas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Thomas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Thomas. Catherine Thomas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stanton, Christopher & Catherine Thomas. (2020). The Gig Economy Beyond Local Services and Transportation. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 21(3). 21–26.1 indexed citations
Pelletier, Adeline & Catherine Thomas. (2018). Information in online labour markets. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 34(3). 376–392.11 indexed citations
8.
Dhingra, Swati, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, Veronica Rappoport, Thomas Sampson, & Catherine Thomas. (2017). UK trade and FDI: A post‐Brexit perspective. Papers of the Regional Science Association. 97(1). 9–25.32 indexed citations
Stanton, Christopher & Catherine Thomas. (2015). Information Frictions and Observable Experience:The New Employer Price Premium in an Online Market.1 indexed citations
12.
Stanton, Christopher & Catherine Thomas. (2014). Learning through interviews and hires: employer search and experimentation in the job matching process. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
13.
Guadalupe, María, Olga Kuzmina, & Catherine Thomas. (2012). Innovation and Foreign Ownership. American Economic Review. 102(7). 3594–3627.380 indexed citations breakdown →
Lazaric, Nathalie, Catherine Thomas, & Christian Longhi. (2008). Gatekeepers of Knowledge versus Platforms of Knowledge: From potential to realized absorptive capacity. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).54 indexed citations
Ghemawat, Pankaj & Catherine Thomas. (2008). Strategic Interaction Across Countries and Multinational Agglomeration: An Application to the Cement Industry. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).1 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, Catherine, et al.. (2005). Indo-Myanmar Border Trade: Status, Problems, and Potentials. North-Eastern Hill University Library (North Eastern Hill University).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.