Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Development and Validation of a Self‐Administered Quality‐of‐Life Outcome Measure for Young, Active Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: The International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT‐33)
2012337 citationsNicholas G. Mohtadi, Damian Griffin et al.Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgeryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Sampson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Sampson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Sampson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Sampson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Sampson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Sampson. The network helps show where Thomas Sampson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Sampson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Sampson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Sampson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Sampson. Thomas Sampson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Grossman, Gene M., Elhanan Helpman, Ezra Oberfield, & Thomas Sampson. (2017). Balanced Growth Despite Uzawa. American Economic Review. 107(4). 1293–1312.46 indexed citations
5.
Dhingra, Swati, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, Thomas Sampson, & John Van Reenen. (2016). The consequences of Brexit for UK trade and living standards. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).82 indexed citations
6.
Matsuda, Dean K., Marc J. Philippon, Marc R. Safran, & Thomas Sampson. (2016). Hip Arthroscopy: Tales From the Crypt.. PubMed. 65. 437–45.1 indexed citations
7.
Dhingra, Swati, Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, & Thomas Sampson. (2015). Should We Stay or Should We Go? The economic consequences of leaving the EU. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).4 indexed citations
Mohtadi, Nicholas G., Damian Griffin, M. Elizabeth Pedersen, et al.. (2012). The Development and Validation of a Self‐Administered Quality‐of‐Life Outcome Measure for Young, Active Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: The International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT‐33). Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 28(5). 595–595.337 indexed citations breakdown →
Cole, Shawn, Thomas Sampson, & Bilal Zia. (2010). Prices or Knowledge? What Drives Demand for Financial Services in Emerging Markets?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).289 indexed citations
Glick, James M., et al.. (1999). Hip Arthroscopy for Acetabular Labral Tears. Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 15(2). 132–137.284 indexed citations
Glick, James M., et al.. (1987). Hip arthroscopy by the lateral approach. Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 3(1). 4–12.202 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.